From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:35:52 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] SMDK6400 regression In-Reply-To: <4E79AAC5.9000803@gmail.com> References: <1316389174-31117-1-git-send-email-s-paulraj@ti.com> <4E76EBFD.9060505@aribaud.net> <20110919074710.D0CAD1407967@gemini.denx.de> <4E773165.1090304@aribaud.net> <4E7836F4.7000903@aribaud.net> <4E79AAC5.9000803@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E7A3C98.8050407@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/21/2011 04:13 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote: > I can provide a quickfix by just remove the static from the > smdk6400-functions. But IMHO it is more sensible to write a proper > header for most of the functions in nand_base.c and remove the static > modifier. Then they can be used in SPLs and no one tries to redo/copy > them again. Scott what's your opinion on that? Sounds good. -Scott