From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:55:49 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation
In-Reply-To: <20110921194920.C5A74140796E@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1315800250-19761-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>	<1315800250-19761-4-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>	<4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com>
	<20110921194920.C5A74140796E@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 09/21/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
> 
> In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux?  It would be nice if we
>> could keep this code in sync.
> 
> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board,
> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 

How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS?

I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an
explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted.

-Scott