From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Babic Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:41:21 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation In-Reply-To: <20110921201635.3FD24140796D@gemini.denx.de> References: <1315800250-19761-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <1315800250-19761-4-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> <20110921194920.C5A74140796E@gemini.denx.de> <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> <20110921201635.3FD24140796D@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4E7AE6A1.4040008@denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Stefano & Marek, > > can you please provide the requested information? > > Hi Scott, > In message <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: >> >>> In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote: >>>> >>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice if we >>>> could keep this code in sync. >>> >>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, >>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. >> >> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? >> >> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have an >> explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. Best regards, Stefano -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de =====================================================================