public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Application of patch submitted during the previous Merge Window
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:46:56 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7C63A0.5050005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110923101802.4BD72140796D@gemini.denx.de>

On 23/09/11 20:18, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
> 
> In message <4E7C4F80.6070904@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Well my two console patches are ready for the next merge window - I notice
>> you have not claimed them, so I'll ping you when it opens
> 
> Just add them to my ToDo list by assigning them to me...

Done - They are still 'New' (didn't know if you wanted that changed)

>>> In the result, a huge patch list is piling up, and dealing with this
>>> becomes more and more frustrating.
>>
>> Well my theory on that would be that if the take-up of a process is not
>> naturally organic, then forcing the issue probably won't work either
> 
> Agreed.  But many people have asked for the tool, and it appears we
> don't have a better one.

Coreboot switched from SVN to git and gerrit

>> Maybe the load can be spread here - maintainers can put these in designated
>> branches in their repositories. I know this will cause the odd conflict,
> 
> If you script this (based on pwapply) you can bail out early if the
> patch is no longer in state "New".
> 
>> but we (the maintainers) could also periodically sync between each other.
>> Another alternative is to create a new repo that all the custodians have
>> access to...
> 
> That would be easy to do...

Maybe that's what we do - Once a patch reaches maturity (a revision with an
Ack and maybe a Tested-by) any maintainer can just put it in the 'next'
repo - You can always veto it and not pull it into mainline anyway, but at
least it gives everyone a semi-stable platform to base patches for the next
merge window

Regards,

Graeme

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-23 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-23  6:21 [U-Boot] Application of patch submitted during the previous Merge Window Graeme Russ
2011-09-23  7:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-23  9:21   ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-23 10:04     ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-23 10:17       ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-23 10:23       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-25 10:24         ` stefano babic
2011-09-23 10:18     ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-23 10:46       ` Graeme Russ [this message]
2011-09-25 19:55         ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-25 20:32           ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-30 22:40           ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-15 15:01         ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Help needed - urgently Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 18:51           ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Custodians - please lend a hand Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 19:34             ` Stefano Babic
2011-11-16 19:48               ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 18:19               ` Detlev Zundel
2011-11-17 20:16                 ` Andy Fleming
2011-11-17 20:58                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 20:38           ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Help needed - urgently Kumar Gala
2011-11-16 21:35             ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 12:40               ` Stefano Babic
2011-11-17 13:41                 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 13:43               ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 14:10                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 14:54                   ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E7C63A0.5050005@gmail.com \
    --to=graeme.russ@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox