From: Graeme Russ <graeme.russ@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Application of patch submitted during the previous Merge Window
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:46:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7C63A0.5050005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110923101802.4BD72140796D@gemini.denx.de>
On 23/09/11 20:18, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
>
> In message <4E7C4F80.6070904@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Well my two console patches are ready for the next merge window - I notice
>> you have not claimed them, so I'll ping you when it opens
>
> Just add them to my ToDo list by assigning them to me...
Done - They are still 'New' (didn't know if you wanted that changed)
>>> In the result, a huge patch list is piling up, and dealing with this
>>> becomes more and more frustrating.
>>
>> Well my theory on that would be that if the take-up of a process is not
>> naturally organic, then forcing the issue probably won't work either
>
> Agreed. But many people have asked for the tool, and it appears we
> don't have a better one.
Coreboot switched from SVN to git and gerrit
>> Maybe the load can be spread here - maintainers can put these in designated
>> branches in their repositories. I know this will cause the odd conflict,
>
> If you script this (based on pwapply) you can bail out early if the
> patch is no longer in state "New".
>
>> but we (the maintainers) could also periodically sync between each other.
>> Another alternative is to create a new repo that all the custodians have
>> access to...
>
> That would be easy to do...
Maybe that's what we do - Once a patch reaches maturity (a revision with an
Ack and maybe a Tested-by) any maintainer can just put it in the 'next'
repo - You can always veto it and not pull it into mainline anyway, but at
least it gives everyone a semi-stable platform to base patches for the next
merge window
Regards,
Graeme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-23 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-23 6:21 [U-Boot] Application of patch submitted during the previous Merge Window Graeme Russ
2011-09-23 7:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-23 9:21 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-23 10:04 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-23 10:17 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-23 10:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-25 10:24 ` stefano babic
2011-09-23 10:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-23 10:46 ` Graeme Russ [this message]
2011-09-25 19:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-25 20:32 ` Graeme Russ
2011-09-30 22:40 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-15 15:01 ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Help needed - urgently Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 18:51 ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Custodians - please lend a hand Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 19:34 ` Stefano Babic
2011-11-16 19:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 18:19 ` Detlev Zundel
2011-11-17 20:16 ` Andy Fleming
2011-11-17 20:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-16 20:38 ` [U-Boot] [STATUS] Help needed - urgently Kumar Gala
2011-11-16 21:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 12:40 ` Stefano Babic
2011-11-17 13:41 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 13:43 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 14:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-11-17 14:54 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7C63A0.5050005@gmail.com \
--to=graeme.russ@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox