[U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] Add general nand functions

[Simon Schwarz <simonschwarzcor@googlemail.com>]

On 09/23/2011 07:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 11:36 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
>> Added a nand_base.h header that defines all prototypes of nand_base.c
>> functions.
>
> Just add the new prototypes to include/linux/mtd/nand.h (which gets
> included by nand.h), that's the header that goes with
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c.
>
That was my first intention. I changed my mind because of the name 
collisions.

>> This is necessary because these functions were often copied
>> in SPLs.
>
> You'd rather add new #includes to dozens of files, and keep duplicated
> code around, than fix a few SPLs?  NACK.
>
Where do you see duplicated code? The additional include?

>> It was necessary to also add nand_interface.c.
>
> You maen nand_interface.h?
>
Yes sorry.

>> This now defines static
>> inline functions former defined in nand.h - theses functions had name
>> conflicts with these in nand_base.c/h.
>
> If we have two functions with the same name that do different things,
> change the name of the one in nand.h.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c b/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c
>> index bfdb586..4568820 100644
>> --- a/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c
>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/lib/board.c
>> @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
>>   #include<kgdb.h>
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NAND
>> -#include<nand.h>	/* cannot even include nand.h if it isnt configured */
>> +#include<nand.h>
>> +#include<nand_interface.h>	/* cannot even include nand.h if it isnt configured */
>
>
> I don't think it's still true that you can't include nand.h if it isn't
> configured, BTW.
>
Auto search and replace.

[SNIP]

so in essence I will:
- rename the inline functions
- just add the functions used in SPL now
- make better patch-splitting

objections?

Regards
Simon