From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:33:56 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] NAND: Allow per-buffer allocation In-Reply-To: <201109241437.53241.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1315800250-19761-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <201109221051.33950.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <4E7CC353.1050704@freescale.com> <201109241437.53241.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E80C594.3050109@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 09/24/2011 07:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 07:35:15 PM Scott Wood wrote: >> On 09/22/2011 03:51 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On Thursday, September 22, 2011 09:41:21 AM Stefano Babic wrote: >>>> On 09/21/2011 10:16 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>>> Dear Stefano & Marek, >>>>> >>>>> can you please provide the requested information? >>>> >>>> Hi Scott, >>>> >>>>> In message <4E7A4145.30501@freescale.com> Scott Wood wrote: >>>>>>> In message <4E7A320D.1030002@freescale.com> you wrote: >>>>>>>> Is this hardware going to be supported in Linux? It would be nice >>>>>>>> if we could keep this code in sync. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Stefano has submitted patches for the iMX28 based M28 / M28EVK board, >>>>>>> so yes, this hardware going to be supported in mainline Linux, too. >>>>>> >>>>>> How do the Linux iMX28 patches deal with NAND_OWN_BUFFERS? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to see this change be submitted to Linux first, or else have >>>>>> an explanation of why a divergence for U-Boot is warranted. >>>> >>>> I tested NAND with the gpmi-nand patches sent to linux-arm by Huang Shije: >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg139526.html >>>> >>>> However, I have not seen the option NAND_OWN_BUFFERS in his patches. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Stefano >>> >>> Like I said, this patch is not needed anymore. It's just a convenience >>> measure now. I don't need to for mx28. >> >> Let's hold off on this patch until it's actually needed, then. > > Very well then, mind merging the rest then ? Yes, I'll try to get to it soon. -Scott