From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:52:05 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Buffer overruns in printf
In-Reply-To: <4E80FC92.9040500@freescale.com>
References: <1316799532-20761-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>	<4E7CEEAF.2040709@aribaud.net>	<CAPnjgZ0HBxWy2c6o9xe6sNjUE3uua3wwr_oc_521NgzeJf=41Q@mail.gmail.com>	<4E7DA4C3.7060203@aribaud.net>	<CAPnjgZ23C8HtVd702e7hhnBv0F+C4tUkEHycKg1_VEviYVvBMQ@mail.gmail.com>	<4E7EE910.8090504@aribaud.net>	<CAPnjgZ081K6YtNYiLaNziqacVh0kLO9VNxgG+Vdk_ZxTjUd5Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E806006.2060105@aribaud.net> <4E80FC92.9040500@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <4E817295.1030200@aribaud.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 27/09/2011 00:28, Scott Wood wrote:

>> - users who actually wisht to limit outpout ca use either
>
> You say "actually wish to limit output" as if "let it corrupt memory if
> it's too large" is the normal thing to want.

What I meant was "users who actually want to limit output explicitly by 
truncating it rather than implicitly by always outputting small enough 
text or crafting limitations in the format string specifiers, ..."

> -scott

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.