From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Thompson Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:57:52 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Convert {in, out}s[bwl] to inline functions In-Reply-To: <201109271221.30295.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1317062895-3847-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20110927093115.56D411407999@gemini.denx.de> <201109271221.30295.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E81BA40.20400@ge.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 27/09/11 11:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:31:15 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Marek Vasut, >> >> In message <1317062895-3847-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> you wrote: >>> The size of uboot binary grows by a few bytes, but the gain (better type >>> checking) is worth it. >> And what _exactly_ are "a few bytes" ? > Nevermind, it must have been some kind of a fluctuation yesterday. Right now, I > made a new measurement and the size didn't change with/without the patch (this > is more what I'd expect to happen). > > Cheers Pure speculation on my part, but /could/ this be because ARM drivers don't tend to use these macros/functions. write[bwl] and the like are much more common. I don't know this to be a fact though. Nick.