From: Helmut Raiger <helmut.raiger@hale.at>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH V2 (forgot generic.c)] mx31: provide readable WEIM CS accessor
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:01:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E847A4E.5000602@hale.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8470D8.1030702@denx.de>
On 09/29/2011 03:21 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
>>
>> static u32 mx31_decode_pll(u32 reg, u32 infreq)
>> {
>> @@ -126,6 +128,13 @@ void mx31_set_pad(enum iomux_pins pin, u32 config)
>>
>> }
>>
>> +void mxc_setup_weimcs(int cs, const struct mxc_weimcs *weimcs)
>> +{
>> + writel(weimcs->upper, WEIM_CSCR_U(cs));
>> + writel(weimcs->lower, WEIM_CSCR_L(cs));
>> + writel(weimcs->additional, WEIM_CSCR_A(cs));
>> +}
> Even if more hidden, the access is always made with base + offset,
> instead of defining a structure.
>
Do you really thing this is more readable:
------------ in imx_regs.h -----------
struct mx31_weim_cscr {
u32 upper;
u32 lower;
u32 additional;
u32 reserved;
};
struct mx31_weim {
struct mx31_weim_cscr cscr[6];
};
-------------- in generic.c --------------
void mxc_setup_weimcs(int cs, const struct mxc_weimcs *weimcs)
{
struct mx31_weim *weim = (struct mx31_weim *) WEIM_BASE;
struct mx31_weim_cscr *cscr = &weim->cscr[cs];
writel(weimcs->upper, &cscr->upper);
writel(weimcs->lower, &cscr->lower);
writel(weimcs->additional, &cscr->additional);
}
It seems pretty clumsy to me, but for sure a matter of taste.
Helmut
--
Scanned by MailScanner.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 12:12 [U-Boot] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 12:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 12:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] TT-01: add basic board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 13:36 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-09-22 13:51 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-06 13:07 ` Helmut Raiger
2011-10-06 13:27 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-22 14:08 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-28 12:48 ` [U-Boot] mx31: Approach for WEIM CS accessors Helmut Raiger
2011-09-28 12:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx31: provide readable WEIM CS accessor Helmut Raiger
2011-09-28 15:14 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 6:32 ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 6:59 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 7:30 ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 9:17 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 12:19 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 12:25 ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH V2 (forgot generic.c)] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 13:21 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 14:01 ` Helmut Raiger [this message]
2011-09-29 14:16 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 14:55 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 15:11 ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 15:19 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 15:45 ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-30 7:32 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-05 11:51 ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH V2 (forgot generic.c)] " Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-14 8:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14 8:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/3] mx31: add ESD control registers Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14 13:29 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14 8:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14 11:04 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14 21:14 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-15 5:40 ` stefano babic
2011-10-15 8:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-15 11:11 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14 10:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 11:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 " Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 11:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/3] mx31: add ESD control registers Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 12:49 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-28 8:28 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 11:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 3/3] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 12:59 ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 12:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Stefano Babic
2011-10-28 8:28 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E847A4E.5000602@hale.at \
--to=helmut.raiger@hale.at \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox