public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Raiger <helmut.raiger@hale.at>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] TT-01: add basic board support for HALE TT-01
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:07:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8DA7FA.6020304@hale.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7B3D52.1030805@denx.de>

Hi Stefano,

>> +include $(TOPDIR)/config.mk
>> +
>> +LIB	= $(obj)lib$(BOARD).o
>> +
>> +COBJS	:= tt01.o
>> +# reuse the mx31pdk low-level setup
>> +SOBJS	:= ../../freescale/mx31pdk/lowlevel_init.o
> It is always a good idea to reuse code, but taking it to another board
> seems hackish. Your board could become broken if the mx31pdk's
> maintainer change his code.
>
> Reading this file I do not see (except setting the AIPS) no good reason
> to write this part in assembly. Everything can be done for example in
> board_early_init_f, and even better we can rationalize this code and put
> it into arch/cpu/arm1136/mx31.

As far as I understood this is called from arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S
before stack is setup. I don't know much about C-calling convention
on the arm1136, but this might be the reason why it's done in assembly.
I'd rather not touch start.S, so I'll copy the file over from mx31pdk?

>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_LEN		(CONFIG_ENV_SIZE + 10*1024*1024)
> 10 MB for heap in bootloader ? Is it ok ? I am only asking if it is
> really wanted.

We are about to display large compressed bitmaps in u-boot, that's why
the heap is that large. The frame buffer driver patch
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/113341/ is still being reviewed,
that is why I left it out here (but kept the heap size).
Additionally I don't care much about time and space here. The production
units will boot from NAND and we'll use a different setup there.
That's why I reserved 1MB for u-boot, I simply didn't want it to overwrite
my environment when being reprogrammed.

>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_CFI		/* Flash memory is CFI compliant */
>> +#define CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER		/* Use drivers/cfi_flash.c */
>> +#define CONFIG_FLASH_SPANSION_S29WS_N
>> +/* TODO: bluetechnix did undefine these for some purpose
> if you do not need to undefine, you can drop this comment. Maybe there
> is no issues with lock/unlock mechanism with the flash you have chosen.

Bluetechnix is the supplier of the SOM we are using. Their original
version of u-boot (1.2 or so) defined these values. So the flash is
definitely the same. I'd like to review this later, therefore the TODO.

>> +#define CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE	(128 * 1024)
>> +#define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE		CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE
> Regarding your previous comment: you could set CONFIG_ENV_SIZE to a
> smaller value as CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE, and this can speed up get/set of
> the environment. Or you could save the environment in tha last (smaller)
> sectors.
>
I'll look into the speed change, but as described above I don't
really care about size.
>> + * on TT-01 UART1 pins are used by Audio, so we use UART2
>> + *   make sure that the transceiver is enabled during PL=1 for testing!
> What does it mean PL=1 ?
>
Nothing that concerns u-boot, it means P(ower)L(evel)=1. The TT-01
implements a hardware that turns off components depending on
the said power level. In PL=1 the RS232 transceiver is usually off.

>> +/* this is currently not supported, mxc_nand.c is too incomplete for it */
> Only for my understanding: Which is the issue with mxc_nand.c ? At the
> moment, we have several boards using it, and I wonder it is incomplete.
> What do you mean ?

Part of this whole mess is, that I actually wrote this board support 2
years ago and simply rebased to finally contribute the stuff. Probably
there is no issue with mxc_nand.c any more (and I don't remember
what was the problem).

Thanks for your thorough review, I'll pass along V2 when we come
to a solution about low_level.S

Helmut


--
Scanned by MailScanner.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-06 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-22 12:12 [U-Boot] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 12:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 12:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] TT-01: add basic board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-09-22 13:36   ` Fabio Estevam
2011-09-22 13:51   ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-06 13:07     ` Helmut Raiger [this message]
2011-10-06 13:27       ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-22 14:08   ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-09-28 12:48     ` [U-Boot] mx31: Approach for WEIM CS accessors Helmut Raiger
2011-09-28 12:48       ` [U-Boot] [PATCH] mx31: provide readable WEIM CS accessor Helmut Raiger
2011-09-28 15:14         ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29  6:32           ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29  6:59             ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29  7:30           ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29  9:17             ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 12:19         ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 12:25         ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH V2 (forgot generic.c)] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 13:21           ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 14:01             ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 14:16               ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 14:55                 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 15:11                   ` Helmut Raiger
2011-09-29 15:19                     ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 15:45                 ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH " Helmut Raiger
2011-09-30  7:32                   ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-05 11:51                   ` Stefano Babic
2011-09-29 17:32               ` [U-Boot] [Resend PATCH V2 (forgot generic.c)] " Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-14  8:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14  8:05   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/3] mx31: add ESD control registers Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14 13:29     ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14  8:05   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-14 11:04     ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14 21:14       ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-15  5:40         ` stefano babic
2011-10-15  8:52           ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-15 11:11             ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-14 10:04   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 11:31 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 " Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 11:31   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/3] mx31: add ESD control registers Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 12:49     ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-28  8:28     ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 11:31   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 3/3] mx31: Add board support for HALE TT-01 Helmut Raiger
2011-10-27 12:59     ` Stefano Babic
2011-10-27 12:49   ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/3] mx31: define pins and init for UART2 and CSPI3 Stefano Babic
2011-10-28  8:28   ` Stefano Babic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E8DA7FA.6020304@hale.at \
    --to=helmut.raiger@hale.at \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox