From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:54:17 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Allow user to disable CPU support library In-Reply-To: <1317860006-18212-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1315800204-19705-3-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> <1317860006-18212-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4E8DCF29.6020903@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU support > library. This can be useful on some setups. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Detlev Zundel > Cc: Scott Wood > --- > spl/Makefile | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile > index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644 > --- a/spl/Makefile > +++ b/spl/Makefile > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y > export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > > +# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this: > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > +endif Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)? Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol? -Scott