From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:15:11 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Fix the work-arounds for errata SERDES-8 & SERDES-A001 on p4080 In-Reply-To: <20111006221235.9574A140874A@gemini.denx.de> References: <1309492845-13117-1-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <1309492845-13117-2-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org> <20111006221235.9574A140874A@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <4E8E286F.3020400@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk wrote: > WARNING: line over 80 characters > #127: FILE: arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c:43: > +#error "CONFIG_SYS_P4080_ERRATUM_SERDES_A001 requires CONFIG_SYS_P4080_ERRATUM_SERDES8" Lines like these would be accepted into the Linux kernel. Are the standards for U-boot stricter than for Linux? It appears that you are requiring exact conformance to checkpatch, even when it complains about something that isn't really that bad. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale