public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle
@ 2011-09-20 23:24 Timur Tabi
  2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: update fdt_alloc_phandle to use fdt_get_phandle Timur Tabi
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2011-09-20 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

fdt_create_phandle() was ignoring errors from fdt_set_phandle().  If an
error occurs, print an error message and return 0, which is an invalid
phandle.  We also need to change the return type for fdt_create_phandle()
to indicate that it cannot return an error code.

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
---
 common/fdt_support.c  |   11 +++++++++--
 include/fdt_support.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
index 46aa842..698abf7 100644
--- a/common/fdt_support.c
+++ b/common/fdt_support.c
@@ -1241,15 +1241,22 @@ int fdt_set_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, uint32_t phandle)
  * @fdt: ptr to device tree
  * @nodeoffset: node to update
  */
-int fdt_create_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset)
+unsigned int fdt_create_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset)
 {
 	/* see if there is a phandle already */
 	int phandle = fdt_get_phandle(fdt, nodeoffset);
 
 	/* if we got 0, means no phandle so create one */
 	if (phandle == 0) {
+		int ret;
+
 		phandle = fdt_alloc_phandle(fdt);
-		fdt_set_phandle(fdt, nodeoffset, phandle);
+		ret = fdt_set_phandle(fdt, nodeoffset, phandle);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			printf("Can't set phandle %u: %s\n", phandle,
+			       fdt_strerror(ret));
+			return 0;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return phandle;
diff --git a/include/fdt_support.h b/include/fdt_support.h
index 8f06aac..7206c56 100644
--- a/include/fdt_support.h
+++ b/include/fdt_support.h
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int fdt_node_offset_by_compat_reg(void *blob, const char *compat,
 					phys_addr_t compat_off);
 int fdt_alloc_phandle(void *blob);
 int fdt_set_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, uint32_t phandle);
-int fdt_create_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset);
+unsigned int fdt_create_phandle(void *fdt, int nodeoffset);
 int fdt_add_edid(void *blob, const char *compat, unsigned char *buf);
 
 int fdt_verify_alias_address(void *fdt, int anode, const char *alias,
-- 
1.7.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: update fdt_alloc_phandle to use fdt_get_phandle
  2011-09-20 23:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Timur Tabi
@ 2011-09-20 23:24 ` Timur Tabi
  2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/85xx: use fdt_create_phandle() to create the Fman firmware phandles Timur Tabi
  2011-10-15 15:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Jerry Van Baren
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2011-09-20 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

The device tree compiler, dtc, can use "phandle" and/or "linux,phandle"
properties to specify the phandle for any node.  By default, it uses
both, but "linux,phandle" is deprecated.  One day, we'd like to stop using
"linux,phandle", but U-boot needs to support both properties equally
first.

fdt_alloc_phandle() generates a unique phandle, but it was only checking
the "linux,phandle" properties.  Instead, we use fdt_get_phandle(),
which checks both properties automatically.  This ensures that we
support dtbs that only use "phandle".

The side-effect is that fdt_alloc_phandle() now takes twice as long, since
it has to check for two properties instead of one in each node that it
searches.

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
---
 common/fdt_support.c |    7 ++-----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
index 698abf7..abf6d53 100644
--- a/common/fdt_support.c
+++ b/common/fdt_support.c
@@ -1182,14 +1182,11 @@ int fdt_node_offset_by_compat_reg(void *blob, const char *compat,
  */
 int fdt_alloc_phandle(void *blob)
 {
-	int offset, len, phandle = 0;
-	const u32 *val;
+	int offset, phandle = 0;
 
 	for (offset = fdt_next_node(blob, -1, NULL); offset >= 0;
 	     offset = fdt_next_node(blob, offset, NULL)) {
-		val = fdt_getprop(blob, offset, "linux,phandle", &len);
-		if (val)
-			phandle = max(*val, phandle);
+		phandle = max(phandle, fdt_get_phandle(blob, offset));
 	}
 
 	return phandle + 1;
-- 
1.7.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/85xx: use fdt_create_phandle() to create the Fman firmware phandles
  2011-09-20 23:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Timur Tabi
  2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: update fdt_alloc_phandle to use fdt_get_phandle Timur Tabi
@ 2011-09-20 23:24 ` Timur Tabi
  2011-10-15 15:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Jerry Van Baren
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2011-09-20 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Function fdt_create_phandle() conveniently creates new phandle properties
using both "linux,phandle" and "phandle", so it should be used by all code
that wants to create a phandle.

The Fman firmware code, which embeds an Fman firmware into the device tree,
was creating the phandle properties manually.  Instead, change it to use
fdt_create_phandle().

Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c |    5 ++---
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c
index d20c94c..9d2d769 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c
@@ -504,9 +504,8 @@ void fdt_fixup_fman_firmware(void *blob)
 		       fdt_strerror(rc));
 		return;
 	}
-	phandle = fdt_alloc_phandle(blob);
-	rc = fdt_setprop_cell(blob, fwnode, "linux,phandle", phandle);
-	if (rc < 0) {
+	phandle = fdt_create_phandle(blob, fwnode);
+	if (!phandle) {
 		char s[64];
 		fdt_get_path(blob, fwnode, s, sizeof(s));
 		printf("Could not add phandle property to node %s: %s\n", s,
-- 
1.7.4.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle
  2011-09-20 23:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Timur Tabi
  2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: update fdt_alloc_phandle to use fdt_get_phandle Timur Tabi
  2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/85xx: use fdt_create_phandle() to create the Fman firmware phandles Timur Tabi
@ 2011-10-15 15:34 ` Jerry Van Baren
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jerry Van Baren @ 2011-10-15 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 09/20/2011 07:24 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> fdt_create_phandle() was ignoring errors from fdt_set_phandle().  If an
> error occurs, print an error message and return 0, which is an invalid
> phandle.  We also need to change the return type for fdt_create_phandle()
> to indicate that it cannot return an error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi<timur@freescale.com>
> ---
>   common/fdt_support.c  |   11 +++++++++--
>   include/fdt_support.h |    2 +-
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Added to u-boot-fdt, sent a pull request to wd.

Thanks,
gvb

[snip]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-15 15:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-20 23:24 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Timur Tabi
2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] fdt: update fdt_alloc_phandle to use fdt_get_phandle Timur Tabi
2011-09-20 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/85xx: use fdt_create_phandle() to create the Fman firmware phandles Timur Tabi
2011-10-15 15:34 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] fdt: check for fdt errors in fdt_create_phandle Jerry Van Baren

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox