From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 02:04:46 +0300
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm926ejs: add NXP LPC32x0 cpu series
	support
In-Reply-To: <4EA200D9.9050206@aribaud.net>
References: <1318953340-30248-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com>
	<4EA200D9.9050206@aribaud.net>
Message-ID: <4EA49D8E.2050704@mleia.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Albert,

On 22.10.2011 02:31, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Le 18/10/2011 17:55, Vladimir Zapolskiy a ?crit :
>> This change adds initial support for NXP LPC32x0 SoC series.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy<vz@mleia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v2 to v3:
>> * checkpatch.pl reports zero errors and warnings
>>
>> Changes from v1 to v2:
>> * BIT(n) and SBF(s, v) macro are not used anymore
>> * removed NS16550 and 14-clock UART definitions from uart.h
>> * added devices.c file, which contains standard UART preinitialization
>> routine
>> * added get_serial_clock() function, it returns actual frequency of
>> UART clock
>> * __udelay() realization is simplified, no need of interrupt handling
>
> As it stands, this is dead code until some board uses it; I imagine you
> have board waiting for this support. Can you submit the SoC and board
> code as a patch set? This way, it will be obvious for all that the SoC
> code in this patch has actual use.

you're right, I have a board to make support for. However I presume that 
U-boot maintainers won't be happy to include a board with 
CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE, and unfortunately flash driver isn't yet ready 
for publishing.

I'd like to get an advice, if you think that weakly supported but 
working U-boot on the board has chances to be included to arm-next I can 
send the patchset right now for review, otherwise I'll spend some time 
(one week approximately) to finish NAND driver.

-- 
With best wishes,
Vladimir