From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: Add SPL support to Beagleboard
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:56:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EAADED9.3020202@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAADB6C.2040909@freescale.com>
On 10/28/2011 09:42 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 11:29 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 10/27/2011 06:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/2011 04:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>>> On 10/27/2011 06:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>> OK, so, Scott, where would you suggest we put a very trivial set of nand
>>>>>> infrastructure we need outside of the scope of loading u-boot itself
>>>>>> from NAND ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can the SPL code be used (not an actual SPL build, just the NAND code
>>>>> associated with it)?
>>>>
>>>> As-is, no, it'll fail to compile unless you fill in a number of blanks
>>>> about ECC and so forth.
>>>
>>> "...with appropriate refactoring" was implied. :-)
>>>
>>>> If we split nand_spl_simple.c in two, we might
>>>> be able to re-use nand_command there (maybe with some re-thinking of the
>>>> #if logic for big or small pages). Give me filenames and I'll do the
>>>> work :)
>>>
>>> Pick whatever name you think makes sense given what's going to be in it.
>>
>> nand_spl_{cmd,read}.c ? _cmd gets the two nand_command() funcs, _read
>> gets everything else. Work for you?
>
> Could you stick a "simple" in there somewhere?
>
> Maybe nand_spl_simple.c and nand_cmd_simple.c (or nand_spl_simple_cmd.c
> if you want to keep the reference to spl as its primary purpose)?
nand_spl_simple.c + nand_spl_simple_cmd.c it is then, thanks. Putting
this on my v2012.03 TODO list (which is when I figure I should have this
all done and a merge window be available).
--
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-28 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-26 21:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH RFT 0/2] Beagleboard SPL support Tom Rini
2011-10-26 21:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] OMAP3 SPL: Rework memory initalization and devkit 8000 support Tom Rini
2011-10-27 20:46 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-27 21:00 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-27 21:27 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-26 21:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] OMAP3: Add SPL support to Beagleboard Tom Rini
2011-10-27 12:46 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2011-10-27 17:08 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-27 21:18 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-27 21:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2011-10-27 23:02 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-27 23:19 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-27 23:35 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-27 21:29 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-27 23:10 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-10-27 23:13 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-27 23:22 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-27 23:33 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-28 16:00 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-28 16:29 ` Tom Rini
2011-10-28 16:42 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-28 16:56 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2011-11-04 16:50 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-01 14:46 ` Tom Rini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-26 20:50 Tom Rini
2011-10-26 20:52 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EAADED9.3020202@ti.com \
--to=trini@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox