From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:38:41 +0400
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] omap/spl: don't assume u-boot.bin size,
 use CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXnSui0D5JrTTrWtVfjt5AEUzBvh61tR+OPxjMeWXZW39A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1318894433-9038-1-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com>	<1318894433-9038-3-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com>
	<CA+M6bXnSui0D5JrTTrWtVfjt5AEUzBvh61tR+OPxjMeWXZW39A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EAE96D1.1080507@emcraft.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Tom, All,

On 18.10.2011 03:43, Tom Rini wrote:
>> Don't hardcode u-boot.bin size for the case where mkimage signature is
>> missing, use CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE for this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>

So what about this patch? Should I drop it?

Regards, Ilya.