From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:39:41 +0400
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/7] omap/spl: actually enable the console
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXkCnjL80AgYSa7b2oHVAEH-V3FN_BnrX4OpgDDua2F6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1318894433-9038-1-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com>	<1318894433-9038-4-git-send-email-yanok@emcraft.com>
	<CA+M6bXkCnjL80AgYSa7b2oHVAEH-V3FN_BnrX4OpgDDua2F6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EAE970D.5020900@emcraft.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Tom,

>> Currently OMAP SPL code does all the initialization but does not set the
>> gd->have_console value so no output is actually performed. This patch
>> sets gd->have_console to 1 if CONFIG_SPL_CONSOLE is defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com>
> 
> So, this is because of a behavior change.  Do we want an SPL_CONSOLE variable?
> Or should we just bring back the previous behavior?  I kind of think
> the previous
> behavior...  Others?

So what will be your decision? Should I remove SPL_CONSOLE and repost
the patch? Or should I drop it completely?

Regards, Ilya.