From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:39:35 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 05/11] arm,
 davinci: add support for new spl framework
In-Reply-To: <4EAF7E57.2000104@denx.de>
References: <1320036790-24283-1-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
	<1320036790-24283-6-git-send-email-hs@denx.de>
	<4EAF1CA7.5010403@freescale.com> <4EAF7E57.2000104@denx.de>
Message-ID: <4EB012B7.5040600@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11/01/2011 12:06 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Scott,
> 
> Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 10/30/2011 11:53 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> This is common to most NAND SPLs.  It would be nice to stick this in a
>> common place (at least the loading part, maybe not the jump).  Not
>> nand_spl_simple.c, as it's utility is not limited to the simple driver.
>>  Maybe drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_load.c?
> 
> moved to drivers/mtd/nand/spl_nand_load.c, also I want to let the jump
> in this file. I prefer the name "spl_nand_load.c as we have already a
> 
> CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE -> CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LOAD -> spl_nand_load.c
> 
> Is this OK for you?
> 
> Shouldn;t we rename nand_spl_simple.c to spl_nand_simple.c also?

I suggested nand_spl_load.c because we already have a nand_spl_simple.c. :-)

I don't really care which way it goes, as long as it's consistent.

-Scott