From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] nand: Merge new implementation of 1-bit ECC from Linux nand driver
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:30:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB056E8.9080101@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAFA47D.6040109@aizo.com>
On 11/01/2011 02:49 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
> Am 31.10.2011 21:15, schrieb Scott Wood:
>> On 10/31/2011 07:22 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
>>> Am 29.10.2011 00:30, schrieb Scott Wood:
>>>> On 10/12/2011 02:32 AM, Christian Hitz wrote:
>>>>> [backport from linux commit 02f8c6aee8df3cdc935e9bdd4f2d020306035dbe]
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch synchronizes the nand driver with the Linux 3.0 state.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adds 1416 bytes to the image size.
>>>>
>>>> What does this version of the code do that warrants the code size
>>>> increase? This could break some SPLs.
>>>>
>>>> If it's just a speed issue, we probably want to stick with the current code.
>>>
>>> It's the rewrite for performance and support for 512 byte pages, but this is
>>> on the basis of the rewritten code.
>>
>> Several SPLs make use of nand_ecc.c, so NACK replacing it with a larger
>> implementation.
>
> So, should I resubmit the patch series without this part?
Not if the current patchset works with this one dropped.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 7:31 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] nand: Merge BCH code from Linux nand driver Christian Hitz
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/8] nand: Add more NAND types " Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:24 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/8] nand: cleanup whitespace Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/8] nand: Merge changes from Linux nand driver Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 21:59 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/8] nand: Merge new implementation of 1-bit ECC " Christian Hitz
2011-10-28 22:30 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-31 12:22 ` Christian Hitz
2011-10-31 20:15 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 7:49 ` Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 20:30 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/8] nand: Merge changes to BBT " Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/8] nand: Sanitize ONFI strings Christian Hitz
2012-01-10 23:28 ` Scott Wood
2011-10-12 7:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 8/8] nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable Christian Hitz
2011-11-01 22:04 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 22:08 ` Scott Wood
2011-11-01 22:09 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:24 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] nand: Merge BCH code from Linux nand driver Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB056E8.9080101@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox