From: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/12] OMAP3 SPL: Add identify_pop_memory function
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:45:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB8DE06.3020503@compulab.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320696348-11664-9-git-send-email-trini@ti.com>
On 11/07/11 22:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
> memory. So to determine DDR timings the NAND chip needs to be probed
> and mfr/id returned to the board to make decisions with. All of this
> code is put into spl_pop_probe.c and controlled via
> CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_POP_PROBE.
I don't see how POP is different from other types of packages
in terms of DRAM.
The same thing can be true also for non-POP packages.
What I'm saying here is, I understand the necessity of that code,
but why call it POP specific?
If it is not POP specific, then please call it some other way
(e.g. ...DRAM_NAND_PROBE).
Also, hypothetically, some other means can be used for DRAM type
identification, so it will be a good thing to split it, but again
it is only hypothetically and it is only my thoughts, so you don't
have to...
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile | 3 +
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/spl_pop_probe.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/sys_proto.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/spl_pop_probe.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
> index 8e85891..772f3d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ COBJS += board.o
> COBJS += clock.o
> COBJS += mem.o
> COBJS += sys_info.o
> +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_POP_PROBE) += spl_pop_probe.o
> +endif
Can't CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_..._PROBE symbol default to "no"
and depend on CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, so you don't need to enclose
it in #ifdef?
>
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_EMIF4) += emif4.o
> COBJS-$(CONFIG_SDRC) += sdrc.o
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/spl_pop_probe.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/spl_pop_probe.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ca66dd9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/spl_pop_probe.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> +/*
> + * (C) Copyright 2011
> + * Texas Instruments, <www.ti.com>
> + *
> + * Author :
> + * Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
> + *
> + * Initial Code from:
> + * Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
> + * Jian Zhang <jzhang@ti.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of
> + * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
> + * MA 02111-1307 USA
The address is subject to change so probably it will be
a good thing to drop the address part (but leave the rest).
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/mem.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
no need for this #ifdef, the whole file compilation depends
on that symbol being defined.
> +static struct gpmc *gpmc_config = (struct gpmc *)GPMC_BASE;
> +
> +/* nand_command: Send a flash command to the flash chip */
> +static void nand_command(u8 command)
> +{
> + writeb(command, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_cmd);
> +
> + if (command == NAND_CMD_RESET) {
> + unsigned char ret_val;
> + nand_command(NAND_CMD_STATUS);
This recursion looks redundant.
Why not just replace it with:
writeb(NAND_CMD_STATUS, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_cmd);
> + do {
> + /* Wait until ready */
> + ret_val = readl(&gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_dat);
> + } while ((ret_val & 0x40) != 0x40);
Can't 0x40 magic be defined to have some more understandable name?
Probably kind of NAND_CMD_READY mask?
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Many boards ship with a PoP chip of both NAND and DDR, so we need
> + * probe the NAND side, very earily, to see what it says and pass this
s/earily/early/
> + * along to the board. The board code will then use this information
> + * to decide what DDR timings to use.
> + */
> +void identify_pop_memory(int *mfr, int *id)
> +{
> + /* Make sure that we have setup GPMC for NAND correctly. */
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG1, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config1);
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG2, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config2);
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG3, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config3);
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG4, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config4);
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG5, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config5);
> + writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG6, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config6);
> +
> + /* Enable the GPMC Mapping */
> + writel((((GPMC_SIZE_128M & 0xF) << 8) | ((NAND_BASE >> 24) & 0x3F) |
> + (1 << 6)), &gpmc_config->cs[0].config7);
> +
> + sdelay(2000);
> +
> + /* Issue a RESET and then READID */
> + nand_command(NAND_CMD_RESET);
> + nand_command(NAND_CMD_READID);
> +
> + writeb(0x0, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_adr);
It would be nice to have a comment, why the above is needed.
> +
> + /* Read off the manufacturer and device id. */
> + *mfr = readb(&gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_dat);
> + *id = readb(&gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_dat);
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/sys_proto.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/sys_proto.h
> index a53d205..2a8b5c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/sys_proto.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/sys_proto.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void per_clocks_enable(void);
> void memif_init(void);
> void sdrc_init(void);
> void do_sdrc_init(u32, u32);
> +void identify_pop_memory(int *, int *);
Same thing, what are the parameters? What is the order?
> void get_board_mem_timings(u32 *, u32 *, u32 *, u32 *, u32 *);
> void emif4_init(void);
> void gpmc_init(void);
--
Regards,
Igor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-08 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 20:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/12]: Add more framework to OMAP3 SPL, port more boards Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/12] OMAP3: Update SDRC dram_init to always call make_cs1_contiguous() Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/12] OMAP3: Add a helper function to set timings in SDRC Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/12] OMAP3: Change mem_ok to clear again after reading back Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/12] OMAP3: Remove get_mem_type prototype Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/12] OMAP3: Add optimal SDRC autorefresh control values Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/12] OMAP3: Suffix all Micron memory timing parts with their speed Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/12] OMAP3 SPL: Rework memory initalization and devkit8000 support Tom Rini
2011-11-08 7:06 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:09 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/12] OMAP3 SPL: Add identify_pop_memory function Tom Rini
2011-11-08 7:45 ` Igor Grinberg [this message]
2011-11-08 15:21 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-09 11:04 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-09 16:41 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] OMAP3: Add SPL support to Beagleboard Tom Rini
2011-11-08 7:57 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:28 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-09 11:07 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/12] OMAP3: Add SPL support to omap3_evm Tom Rini
2011-11-08 8:02 ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:29 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-08 16:06 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/12] AM3517: Add SPL support Tom Rini
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/12] AM3517 CraneBoard: " Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB8DE06.3020503@compulab.co.il \
--to=grinberg@compulab.co.il \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox