public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/12] OMAP3 SPL: Add identify_pop_memory function
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:21:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB948FE.40107@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EB8DE06.3020503@compulab.co.il>

On 11/08/2011 12:45 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 11/07/11 22:05, Tom Rini wrote:
>> A number of boards are populated with a PoP chip for both DDR and NAND
>> memory.  So to determine DDR timings the NAND chip needs to be probed
>> and mfr/id returned to the board to make decisions with.  All of this
>> code is put into spl_pop_probe.c and controlled via
>> CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_POP_PROBE.
> 
> I don't see how POP is different from other types of packages
> in terms of DRAM.
> The same thing can be true also for non-POP packages.
> What I'm saying here is, I understand the necessity of that code,
> but why call it POP specific?
> If it is not POP specific, then please call it some other way
> (e.g. ...DRAM_NAND_PROBE).
> Also, hypothetically, some other means can be used for DRAM type
> identification, so it will be a good thing to split it, but again
> it is only hypothetically and it is only my thoughts, so you don't
> have to...

Well, that gets at why I called it spl_pop_probe.  If you have a POP
package, this is how you would do the probe.  I can see in theory
wanting to probe NAND as a way to see board rev on a non-POP package,
but I'd like to see a real example first.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
>> index 8e85891..772f3d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/Makefile
>> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ COBJS	+= board.o
>>  COBJS	+= clock.o
>>  COBJS	+= mem.o
>>  COBJS	+= sys_info.o
>> +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> +COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_POP_PROBE)	+= spl_pop_probe.o
>> +endif
> 
> Can't CONFIG_SPL_OMAP3_..._PROBE symbol default to "no"
> and depend on CONFIG_SPL_BUILD, so you don't need to enclose
> it in #ifdef?

But then it would build for both SPL and non-SPL cases.

[snip]
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
>> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
>> + * MA 02111-1307 USA
> 
> The address is subject to change so probably it will be
> a good thing to drop the address part (but leave the rest).

Just following existing examples.

> 
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <common.h>
>> +#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
>> +#include <asm/arch/mem.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> 
> no need for this #ifdef, the whole file compilation depends
> on that symbol being defined.

True, will fix, thanks.

> 
>> +static struct gpmc *gpmc_config = (struct gpmc *)GPMC_BASE;
>> +
>> +/* nand_command: Send a flash command to the flash chip */
>> +static void nand_command(u8 command)
>> +{
>> +	writeb(command, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_cmd);
>> +
>> +	if (command == NAND_CMD_RESET) {
>> +		unsigned char ret_val;
>> +		nand_command(NAND_CMD_STATUS);
> 
> This recursion looks redundant.
> Why not just replace it with:
> writeb(NAND_CMD_STATUS, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_cmd);

OK, thanks.

>> +		do {
>> +			/* Wait until ready */
>> +			ret_val = readl(&gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_dat);
>> +		} while ((ret_val & 0x40) != 0x40);
> 
> Can't 0x40 magic be defined to have some more understandable name?
> Probably kind of NAND_CMD_READY mask?

I'll see if the datasheet defines this particular bit of magic.

> 
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Many boards ship with a PoP chip of both NAND and DDR, so we need
>> + * probe the NAND side, very earily, to see what it says and pass this
> 
> s/earily/early/

Thanks.

>> + * along to the board.  The board code will then use this information
>> + * to decide what DDR timings to use.
>> + */
>> +void identify_pop_memory(int *mfr, int *id)
>> +{
>> +	/* Make sure that we have setup GPMC for NAND correctly. */
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG1, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config1);
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG2, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config2);
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG3, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config3);
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG4, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config4);
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG5, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config5);
>> +	writel(M_NAND_GPMC_CONFIG6, &gpmc_config->cs[0].config6);
>> +
>> +	/* Enable the GPMC Mapping */
>> +	writel((((GPMC_SIZE_128M & 0xF) << 8) | ((NAND_BASE >> 24) & 0x3F) |
>> +				(1 << 6)), &gpmc_config->cs[0].config7);
>> +
>> +	sdelay(2000);
>> +
>> +	/* Issue a RESET and then READID */
>> +	nand_command(NAND_CMD_RESET);
>> +	nand_command(NAND_CMD_READID);
>> +
>> +	writeb(0x0, &gpmc_config->cs[0].nand_adr);
> 
> It would be nice to have a comment, why the above is needed.

OK.

--
Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-08 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-07 20:05 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/12]: Add more framework to OMAP3 SPL, port more boards Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/12] OMAP3: Update SDRC dram_init to always call make_cs1_contiguous() Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/12] OMAP3: Add a helper function to set timings in SDRC Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/12] OMAP3: Change mem_ok to clear again after reading back Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/12] OMAP3: Remove get_mem_type prototype Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/12] OMAP3: Add optimal SDRC autorefresh control values Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/12] OMAP3: Suffix all Micron memory timing parts with their speed Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/12] OMAP3 SPL: Rework memory initalization and devkit8000 support Tom Rini
2011-11-08  7:06   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:09     ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/12] OMAP3 SPL: Add identify_pop_memory function Tom Rini
2011-11-08  7:45   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:21     ` Tom Rini [this message]
2011-11-09 11:04       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-09 16:41         ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 20:05 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/12] OMAP3: Add SPL support to Beagleboard Tom Rini
2011-11-08  7:57   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:28     ` Tom Rini
2011-11-09 11:07       ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/12] OMAP3: Add SPL support to omap3_evm Tom Rini
2011-11-08  8:02   ` Igor Grinberg
2011-11-08 15:29     ` Tom Rini
2011-11-08 16:06       ` Tom Rini
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/12] AM3517: Add SPL support Tom Rini
2011-11-07 22:03 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/12] AM3517 CraneBoard: " Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EB948FE.40107@ti.com \
    --to=trini@ti.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox