From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:59:08 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] x86: Do no use reparm as it break libgcc linkage
In-Reply-To: <201111102055.29318.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <1320834779-15460-1-git-send-email-graeme.russ@gmail.com>
	<201111102040.43303.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<CALButC+E-NJ5aAW=t27ADCJmV9uurvy-R39O3n6JR8jpiFwiAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201111102055.29318.vapier@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <4EBD7E8C.40401@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11/10/2011 07:55 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 10 November 2011 20:51:47 Graeme Russ wrote:
>> A few questions (I am unfamiliar with the Linux build environment):
>>
>>  a) Does Linux link to libgcc
> 
> no Linux port uses libgcc.  they've always done the equivalent of 
> PRIVATE_LIBGCC.  but in the case of x86, i can't see them providing any libgcc 
> funcs.  so i don't think u-boot should either.

Some of the less common architectures (openrisc, h8300, cris, m32r,
tile, xtensa) appear to use libgcc.

unicore32 appears to pull selected objects out of both libgcc and libc.

-Scott