[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] smsc95xx: Fix MAC address programming

[Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>]

On 11/11/2011 04:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2011 07:33:00 Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 11/11/2011 12:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Commit 79ad54400932d6484178a372fb3b659e3437473b broke the MAC
>>>> address programming. Fix this by using the method from Linux'
>>>> smsc95xx_set_mac_address().
>>>>
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/eth/smsc95xx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/eth/smsc95xx.c
>>>>
>>>> -	u32 addr_lo, addr_hi;
>>>> +	u32 addr_lo = eth->enetaddr[0] | eth->enetaddr[1] << 8 |
>>>> +		eth->enetaddr[2] << 16 | eth->enetaddr[3] << 24;
>>>> +	u32 addr_hi = eth->enetaddr[4] | eth->enetaddr[5] << 8;
>>>>
>>>>  	int ret;
>>>>  	
>>>>  	/* set hardware address */
>>>>  	debug("** %s()\n", __func__);
>>>>
>>>> -	addr_lo = cpu_to_le32(*eth->enetaddr);
>>>> -	addr_hi = cpu_to_le16(*((u16 *)(eth->enetaddr + 4)));
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>
>>> didn't Mike Frysinger send similar patch yesterday? Also, do you have the
>>
>> Ah, I obviously missed that.
>>
>>> hardware? If so, that's good, we know you can provide tested fix.
>>
>> Well, yes, I know somebody who has smsc95xx hardware ;-).
>>
>>> Mike, are you good with using this fix instead or can you two negotiate?
>>
>> Let's await Mike's answer (now on CC as well). I need to re-send the
>> series anyway due to a stupid typo.
> 
> mine might take a little longer due to wrangling with wolfgang.  i'd suggest 
> we go with your patch (although i have feedback on it).
> -mike

Well, I have no problem with your patch if it fixes the same issue
correctly... and preparing and testing a new patch series takes time. I
will simply add my "Tested-by" when I have feedback and we then can drop
my other patches.

Wolfgang.