From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:09:20 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Pull request: u-boot-staging In-Reply-To: <4ECCABD9.3030101@denx.de> References: <4EC61E4C.8040107@denx.de> <20111121211014.523FB1ADFED2@gemini.denx.de> <4ECB6461.8070509@denx.de> <4ECC9D3F.2080100@compulab.co.il> <4ECCABD9.3030101@denx.de> Message-ID: <4ECCB840.9050700@compulab.co.il> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 11/23/11 10:16, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 23/11/2011 08:14, Igor Grinberg wrote: >> Hi Stefano, >> > > Hi Igor, > >> Probably, it is too late now, but there is no your Signed-off-by >> on any of the patches from sbabic at denx.de branch on u-boot-staging. >> If you use "git am" for applying patches, then you should also add "-s" flag. > > I do not think it is correct, but I am asking to the ML and Wolfgang to > be sure. I should add my Signed-off if I rearrange the patches or > introduce some modifications that are not cosmetic. > > Because I am not the author of the patches, I do not add my Signed-off, > and I do the same for u-boot-imx, where I am the custodian. As far as I > know, all custodians are doing in the same way. I see... Is there a U-Boot policy regarding this somewhere? Because in Linux every person involved in pushing patches should add an SOB to the commit message. So is it different in U-Boot? Interesting... -- Regards, Igor.