public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
@ 2011-10-28 19:21 Stephen Warren
  2011-10-28 19:43 ` Doug Anderson
  2011-10-30 15:44 ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2011-10-28 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Commit deb5ca80275e8cfa74d5680b41204e08a095eca5 "disk: part_efi: fix
**pgpt_pte == NULL" modified the code to pass "&gpt_head" to
is_gpt_valid() rather than the previous "gpt_head". However, gpt_head
is a pointer to the buffer, not the actual buffer, since it was allocated
using ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER. This caused is_gpt_valid() to read the
disk block onto the stack rather than into the buffer, causing the
code to fail.

This change reverts that portion of the commit mentioned above.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
 disk/part_efi.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
index e7f2714..ddf80a7 100644
--- a/disk/part_efi.c
+++ b/disk/part_efi.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void print_part_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc)
 	}
 	/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
 	if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
-			 &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
+			 gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
 		printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int get_partition_info_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc, int part,
 
 	/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
 	if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
-			&(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
+			gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
 		printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
 		return -1;
 	}
-- 
1.7.0.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-10-28 19:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage Stephen Warren
@ 2011-10-28 19:43 ` Doug Anderson
  2011-10-28 22:47   ` Anton Staaf
  2011-10-30 15:44 ` Mike Frysinger
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Doug Anderson @ 2011-10-28 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Acked-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

...to be fair though, the regression appears to be caused by a mid-air
collision of Anton's change (f75dd584cdfe29dfdcfd424bb237b9238cfb8fe4) with
my change.  His patch was committed on Oct 25th (though authored earlier).
 When I submitted my patch on the Oct 19th against denx/master, I'm pretty
sure it was correct.

Thank you for finding / fixing!  :)

-Doug

---

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Commit deb5ca80275e8cfa74d5680b41204e08a095eca5 "disk: part_efi: fix
> **pgpt_pte == NULL" modified the code to pass "&gpt_head" to
> is_gpt_valid() rather than the previous "gpt_head". However, gpt_head
> is a pointer to the buffer, not the actual buffer, since it was allocated
> using ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER. This caused is_gpt_valid() to read the
> disk block onto the stack rather than into the buffer, causing the
> code to fail.
>
> This change reverts that portion of the commit mentioned above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  disk/part_efi.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
> index e7f2714..ddf80a7 100644
> --- a/disk/part_efi.c
> +++ b/disk/part_efi.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void print_part_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc)
>        }
>        /* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>        if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
> -                        &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
> +                        gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>                printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>                return;
>        }
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int get_partition_info_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc,
> int part,
>
>        /* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>        if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
> -                       &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
> +                       gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>                printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>                return -1;
>        }
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-10-28 19:43 ` Doug Anderson
@ 2011-10-28 22:47   ` Anton Staaf
  2011-10-29  0:04     ` Simon Glass
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anton Staaf @ 2011-10-28 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Thanks Stephen, sorry Doug.  :)

-Anton

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> Acked-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>
> ...to be fair though, the regression appears to be caused by a mid-air
> collision of Anton's change (f75dd584cdfe29dfdcfd424bb237b9238cfb8fe4) with
> my change. ?His patch was committed on Oct 25th (though authored earlier).
> ?When I submitted my patch on the Oct 19th against denx/master, I'm pretty
> sure it was correct.
>
> Thank you for finding / fixing! ?:)
>
> -Doug
>
> ---
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>> Commit deb5ca80275e8cfa74d5680b41204e08a095eca5 "disk: part_efi: fix
>> **pgpt_pte == NULL" modified the code to pass "&gpt_head" to
>> is_gpt_valid() rather than the previous "gpt_head". However, gpt_head
>> is a pointer to the buffer, not the actual buffer, since it was allocated
>> using ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER. This caused is_gpt_valid() to read the
>> disk block onto the stack rather than into the buffer, causing the
>> code to fail.
>>
>> This change reverts that portion of the commit mentioned above.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> ?disk/part_efi.c | ? ?4 ++--
>> ?1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
>> index e7f2714..ddf80a7 100644
>> --- a/disk/part_efi.c
>> +++ b/disk/part_efi.c
>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void print_part_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc)
>> ? ? ? ?}
>> ? ? ? ?/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>> ? ? ? ?if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return;
>> ? ? ? ?}
>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int get_partition_info_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc,
>> int part,
>>
>> ? ? ? ?/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>> ? ? ? ?if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -1;
>> ? ? ? ?}
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-10-28 22:47   ` Anton Staaf
@ 2011-10-29  0:04     ` Simon Glass
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2011-10-29  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
> Thanks Stephen, sorry Doug. ?:)
>
> -Anton
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Acked-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

>>
>> ...to be fair though, the regression appears to be caused by a mid-air
>> collision of Anton's change (f75dd584cdfe29dfdcfd424bb237b9238cfb8fe4) with
>> my change. ?His patch was committed on Oct 25th (though authored earlier).
>> ?When I submitted my patch on the Oct 19th against denx/master, I'm pretty
>> sure it was correct.
>>
>> Thank you for finding / fixing! ?:)
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>> ---
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Commit deb5ca80275e8cfa74d5680b41204e08a095eca5 "disk: part_efi: fix
>>> **pgpt_pte == NULL" modified the code to pass "&gpt_head" to
>>> is_gpt_valid() rather than the previous "gpt_head". However, gpt_head
>>> is a pointer to the buffer, not the actual buffer, since it was allocated
>>> using ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER. This caused is_gpt_valid() to read the
>>> disk block onto the stack rather than into the buffer, causing the
>>> code to fail.
>>>
>>> This change reverts that portion of the commit mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> ?disk/part_efi.c | ? ?4 ++--
>>> ?1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/disk/part_efi.c b/disk/part_efi.c
>>> index e7f2714..ddf80a7 100644
>>> --- a/disk/part_efi.c
>>> +++ b/disk/part_efi.c
>>> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ void print_part_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc)
>>> ? ? ? ?}
>>> ? ? ? ?/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>>> ? ? ? ?if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
>>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?&(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return;
>>> ? ? ? ?}
>>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int get_partition_info_efi(block_dev_desc_t * dev_desc,
>>> int part,
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?/* This function validates AND fills in the GPT header and PTE */
>>> ? ? ? ?if (is_gpt_valid(dev_desc, GPT_PRIMARY_PARTITION_TABLE_LBA,
>>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? &(gpt_head), &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? gpt_head, &gpt_pte) != 1) {
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?printf("%s: *** ERROR: Invalid GPT ***\n", __func__);
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -1;
>>> ? ? ? ?}
>>> --
>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-10-28 19:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage Stephen Warren
  2011-10-28 19:43 ` Doug Anderson
@ 2011-10-30 15:44 ` Mike Frysinger
  2011-11-15 18:25   ` Anton Staaf
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2011-10-30 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20111030/3bea2a5c/attachment.pgp 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-10-30 15:44 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2011-11-15 18:25   ` Anton Staaf
  2011-11-22 22:10     ` Simon Glass
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anton Staaf @ 2011-11-15 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
recent request for help?

Thanks,
    Anton

On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> -mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-15 18:25   ` Anton Staaf
@ 2011-11-22 22:10     ` Simon Glass
  2011-11-22 22:38       ` Anatolij Gustschin
  2011-11-23  8:30       ` Stefano Babic
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2011-11-22 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
> Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
> Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
> recent request for help?
>
> Thanks,
> ? ?Anton
>

Please can one of the maintainers grab this and put it in staging?

Regards,
Simon

> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
>> -mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-22 22:10     ` Simon Glass
@ 2011-11-22 22:38       ` Anatolij Gustschin
  2011-11-22 22:42         ` Simon Glass
  2011-11-23  8:30       ` Stefano Babic
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Anatolij Gustschin @ 2011-11-22 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Hi Simon,

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:10:12 -0800
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
> > Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
> > recent request for help?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ? ?Anton
> >
> 
> Please can one of the maintainers grab this and put it in staging?

I've seen similar patch, it is already in arm tree:

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=81432275812e7d9b3b5eec9c54c6c58dfe506759

Anatolij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-22 22:38       ` Anatolij Gustschin
@ 2011-11-22 22:42         ` Simon Glass
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2011-11-22 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:10:12 -0800
> Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
>> > Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
>> > recent request for help?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > ? ?Anton
>> >
>>
>> Please can one of the maintainers grab this and put it in staging?
>
> I've seen similar patch, it is already in arm tree:
>
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=81432275812e7d9b3b5eec9c54c6c58dfe506759

OK, that's a funny place for it, but OK. Thanks for pointing that out.

Regards,
Simon

>
> Anatolij
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-22 22:10     ` Simon Glass
  2011-11-22 22:38       ` Anatolij Gustschin
@ 2011-11-23  8:30       ` Stefano Babic
  2011-11-23 19:18         ` Simon Glass
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Babic @ 2011-11-23  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On 22/11/2011 23:10, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
>> Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
>> recent request for help?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>    Anton
>>
> 
> Please can one of the maintainers grab this and put it in staging?

Hi Simon,

I grab it in my TODO list in patchwork, I will take a look at it.

Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-23  8:30       ` Stefano Babic
@ 2011-11-23 19:18         ` Simon Glass
  2011-11-23 20:57           ` stefano babic
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2011-11-23 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
> On 22/11/2011 23:10, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Tested-by: Anton Staaf <robotboy@chromium.org>
>>> Mike, do you think you could pull this into staging as per Wolfgang's
>>> recent request for help?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ? ?Anton
>>>
>>
>> Please can one of the maintainers grab this and put it in staging?
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I grab it in my TODO list in patchwork, I will take a look at it.

Thanks Stefano - please also see Anatolij's email on this thread. It
seems that Albert may have picked up a similar patch.

Regards,
Simon

>
> Stefano
>
> --
> =====================================================================
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, ? ? MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 ?Email: office at denx.de
> =====================================================================
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage
  2011-11-23 19:18         ` Simon Glass
@ 2011-11-23 20:57           ` stefano babic
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: stefano babic @ 2011-11-23 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

Am 23/11/2011 20:18, schrieb Simon Glass:

> 
> Thanks Stefano - please also see Anatolij's email on this thread. It
> seems that Albert may have picked up a similar patch.

In fact the patch "Fix errors noticed after enabling
CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION for the OMAP3 EVM board" has already fixed this
issue. There is no need to merge this patch.

Best regards.
Stefano Babic

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-23 20:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-28 19:21 [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: part_efi: fix regression due to incorrect buffer usage Stephen Warren
2011-10-28 19:43 ` Doug Anderson
2011-10-28 22:47   ` Anton Staaf
2011-10-29  0:04     ` Simon Glass
2011-10-30 15:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-15 18:25   ` Anton Staaf
2011-11-22 22:10     ` Simon Glass
2011-11-22 22:38       ` Anatolij Gustschin
2011-11-22 22:42         ` Simon Glass
2011-11-23  8:30       ` Stefano Babic
2011-11-23 19:18         ` Simon Glass
2011-11-23 20:57           ` stefano babic

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox