From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mmc: Change board_mmc_getcd() signature.
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:54:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDCA2DA.4000207@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111205100051.GA4935@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>
On 05/12/2011 11:00, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> The new API no longer uses the extra cd parameter that was used
>>> to store the card presence state. Instead, this information is
>>> returned via the function's return value. board_mmc_getcd()
>>> returns -1 to indicate that no card-detection mechanism is
>>> implemented; 0 indicates that no card is present and 1 is
>>> returned if it was detected that a card is present.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
>>> <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
>>
>> A silly question -- why do we need this change ? Can you explain
>> it in the changelog of V2 too?
>
> It's the first step in implementing card-detection. I discussed
> this with Andy and he came up with the idea that board_mmc_getcd()
> should really have had the mmc parameter as first argument in the
> first place instead of the cd parameter.
Ok, I get it now.
> Furthermore, the cd parameter is used inconsistently in individual
> implementations. After some discussion we came to the conclusion
> that the cd parameter wasn't required at all and the same
> information can be represented in the return value. The whole
> discussion is in this thread:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-November/110180.html
>
> It's not really a necessary change, but it makes board_mmc_getcd()
> much more consistent with other MMC-related functions.
>
> Perhaps this last sentence would be a good explanation to put in
> the v2 commit message?
Ok, thanks - this explains much better which is your intention for the
patchset. It is also not bad to add a reference to the above thread.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-05 8:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mmc: Change board_mmc_getcd() signature Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 8:23 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mmc: Implement card detection Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 8:23 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] mmc: fsl_esdhc: Implement card-detect hook Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 10:47 ` Stefano Babic
2011-12-05 12:49 ` Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 8:23 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] mmc: tegra2: " Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 9:53 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mmc: Change board_mmc_getcd() signature Marek Vasut
2011-12-05 10:00 ` Thierry Reding
2011-12-05 10:54 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2011-12-05 11:02 ` Marek Vasut
2011-12-05 10:40 ` Stefano Babic
2011-12-05 12:53 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDCA2DA.4000207@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox