From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?= Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:41:51 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Getting ready for -rc1 In-Reply-To: <4EDF681B.3000403@stackframe.org> References: <20111206111222.D9B7E1F9E48@gemini.denx.de> <4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de> <20111207102524.4EC9C1EFEDC@gemini.denx.de> <4EDF4521.6060901@gmail.com> <4EDF681B.3000403@stackframe.org> Message-ID: <4EDF6D1F.8070007@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Sven, Am 07.12.2011 14:20, schrieb Sven Schnelle: > Hi Andreas, > > On 12/07/2011 02:51 AM, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> Am 07.12.2011 11:25, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: >>> Dear Andreas, >>> In message <4EDF3855.5010202@corscience.de> you wrote: >>> These are waiting for merge: >>> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/117688/ (unbreak avr32 arch) >>> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/120993/ (new mmc framework for >>> avr32, brake some board/mmc combinations) >>> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new mmc framework) >>> * http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128931/ >>> This is MMC stuff, so they go through Andy's tree. >> Only two of them are MMC related. >>> Maybe you should put him on Cc: (done now). >>> >>> Instead of adding broken stuff to fix it later you might want to >>> submit a new version of this stuff that sqashes the patches. >> Well, only the "http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ (unbreak new >> mmc framework)" is from me. The 'new mmc framework for avr32' is from >> Sven Schnelle and yes, we could merge these two together .. sven? > > No objections against merging those two patches together. Can you do > that for me, as i'm traveling > and have no access to all the AVR32 stuff for testing. I can do so, but not before Friday ... Andy should comment on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/119780/ before doing the merge cause this patch was an RFC ... will forward the patch to him and ask. IMHO those two patches (120993 and 119780) are not a _must_ have for rc1 (or this release at all), but they where posted before merge window closed (and on my wish list). best regards Andreas Bie?mann