From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Igor Grinberg Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:17:20 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EDF9190.4080308@compulab.co.il> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 12/07/11 18:00, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > [snip] >> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not >> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What >> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not >> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as >> spllib ? > > There's a lot of thinking and reworking we should do for the SPL code > we have today under arch/arm, both in terms of sharing between davinci > and OMAP(ish) and non-TI parts. My question is, for non-TI stuff, is > anyone using or about to start using this framework? I think NVIDIA Tegra can benefit from this. Added Simon Glass to Cc. -- Regards, Igor.