[U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting)

[U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting)

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
[snip]
> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not
> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What
> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not
> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as
> spllib ?

There's a lot of thinking and reworking we should do for the SPL code
we have today under arch/arm, both in terms of sharing between davinci
and OMAP(ish) and non-TI parts.  My question is, for non-TI stuff, is
anyone using or about to start using this framework?

-- 
Tom

[U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting)

[Igor Grinberg]

On 12/07/11 18:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
> [snip]
>> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not
>> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What
>> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not
>> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as
>> spllib ?
> 
> There's a lot of thinking and reworking we should do for the SPL code
> we have today under arch/arm, both in terms of sharing between davinci
> and OMAP(ish) and non-TI parts.  My question is, for non-TI stuff, is
> anyone using or about to start using this framework?

I think NVIDIA Tegra can benefit from this.
Added Simon Glass to Cc.


-- 
Regards,
Igor.

[U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting)

[Simon Glass]

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> wrote:
> On 12/07/11 18:00, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not
>>> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What
>>> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not
>>> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as
>>> spllib ?
>>
>> There's a lot of thinking and reworking we should do for the SPL code
>> we have today under arch/arm, both in terms of sharing between davinci
>> and OMAP(ish) and non-TI parts. ?My question is, for non-TI stuff, is
>> anyone using or about to start using this framework?
>
> I think NVIDIA Tegra can benefit from this.
> Added Simon Glass to Cc.

The Tegra boot rom can load the whole U-Boot in from various media
types so we haven't had to use SPL to date. I have been trying out a
way of moving a good chunk of the code (that is useful to devs but not
used in a normal boot) into the back end of the image to load later.
But this is just a link trick and not really related to SPL (although
I think it might have application if we want to generalise SPL).

Samsung and Freescale use it I think. I agree that SPL code should be
as generic as possible.

Regards,
Simon

>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor.

[U-Boot] Non-OMAP/DaVinci ARM SPL? (Was: Re: [PATCH V9 2/4] omap-common: Add NAND SPL linux booting)

[Stefano Babic]

On 07/12/2011 17:00, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> wrote:
> [snip]
>> The function you write are in omap-common/spl_nand.c, but they are not
>> specific for OMAP, and any architecture can profit from your work. What
>> about to move common functions away from TI related directory ? I do not
>> know which is the best place, maybe a new directory under the root as
>> spllib ?
> 
> There's a lot of thinking and reworking we should do for the SPL code
> we have today under arch/arm, both in terms of sharing between davinci
> and OMAP(ish) and non-TI parts.  My question is, for non-TI stuff, is
> anyone using or about to start using this framework?

I am still using with TI, but my goal is to have it available for the
IMX SOCs, too. Some of them boot with old spl code (MX3x), and some of
them (MX5 and in future MX6) need it and it would be nice to reuse the code.

Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================