* [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add function board_nand_init_tail() for some special NAND controllers
@ 2011-12-12 9:49 Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] mtd/nand: Fixup for support ONFI detect Shengzhou Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shengzhou Liu @ 2011-12-12 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In some NAND controllers there is a size limitation of RAM buffer(2K bytes).
To support large-page NAND chips with greater than 2K pagesize, we need a large
buffer, but we don't know pagesize before calling nand_scan_ident(), for more
flexible and to identify different cases of large-page greater than 2K bytes,
we have a board_nand_init_tail() between nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
index d987f4c..14b4d67 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
@@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ static ulong base_address[CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE] = CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIS
static const char default_nand_name[] = "nand";
static __attribute__((unused)) char dev_name[CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE][8];
+int __board_nand_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ /* Allow for init at tail in controller-specific file for some reason */
+ return 0;
+}
+int board_nand_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+__attribute__((weak, alias("__board_nand_init_tail")));
+
static void nand_init_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *nand,
ulong base_addr)
{
@@ -51,7 +59,16 @@ static void nand_init_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *nand,
nand->IO_ADDR_R = nand->IO_ADDR_W = (void __iomem *)base_addr;
if (board_nand_init(nand) == 0) {
- if (nand_scan(mtd, maxchips) == 0) {
+ if (!nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, NULL)) {
+ if (board_nand_init_tail(mtd)) {
+ mtd->name = NULL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (nand_scan_tail(mtd)) {
+ mtd->name = NULL;
+ return;
+ }
if (!mtd->name)
mtd->name = (char *)default_nand_name;
#ifdef CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC
--
1.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] mtd/nand: Fixup for support ONFI detect
2011-12-12 9:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add function board_nand_init_tail() for some special NAND controllers Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 9:49 ` Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Shengzhou Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shengzhou Liu @ 2011-12-12 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In the past the ONFI never worked dut to u-boot aborted when nand device id
not found in ids table. Now if not found in ids table, u-boot still continues
to detect by ONFI way.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 27f6c77..fd38477 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -2592,10 +2592,17 @@ static const struct nand_flash_dev *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
if (*dev_id == type->id)
break;
+ if (!type->name || !type->pagesize) {
+ /* Check if chip is ONFI compliant */
+ ret = nand_flash_detect_onfi(mtd, chip, &busw);
+ if (ret)
+ goto ident_done;
+ }
+
if (!type->name) {
/* supress warning if there is no nand */
if (*maf_id != 0x00 && *maf_id != 0xff &&
- *dev_id != 0x00 && *dev_id != 0xff)
+ *dev_id != 0x00 && *dev_id != 0xff)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unknown NAND device: "
"Manufacturer ID: 0x%02x, Chip ID: 0x%02x\n",
__func__, *maf_id, *dev_id);
@@ -2608,14 +2615,19 @@ static const struct nand_flash_dev *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
chip->chipsize = (uint64_t)type->chipsize << 20;
chip->onfi_version = 0;
- ret = nand_flash_detect_onfi(mtd, chip, &busw);
- if (!ret)
- nand_flash_detect_non_onfi(mtd, chip, type, &busw);
+ nand_flash_detect_non_onfi(mtd, chip, type, &busw);
/* Get chip options, preserve non chip based options */
chip->options &= ~NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK;
chip->options |= type->options & NAND_CHIPOPTIONS_MSK;
+ /* Check if chip is a not a samsung device. Do not clear the
+ * options for chips which are not having an extended id.
+ */
+ if (*maf_id != NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG && !type->pagesize)
+ chip->options &= ~NAND_SAMSUNG_LP_OPTIONS;
+
+ident_done:
/*
* Set chip as a default. Board drivers can override it, if necessary
*/
@@ -2657,12 +2669,6 @@ static const struct nand_flash_dev *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
chip->badblockpos = mtd->writesize > 512 ?
NAND_LARGE_BADBLOCK_POS : NAND_SMALL_BADBLOCK_POS;
- /* Check if chip is a not a samsung device. Do not clear the
- * options for chips which are not having an extended id.
- */
- if (*maf_id != NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG && !type->pagesize)
- chip->options &= ~NAND_SAMSUNG_LP_OPTIONS;
-
/* Check for AND chips with 4 page planes */
if (chip->options & NAND_4PAGE_ARRAY)
chip->erase_cmd = multi_erase_cmd;
--
1.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] mtd/nand: Fixup for support ONFI detect Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 9:49 ` Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 18:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Scott Wood
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shengzhou Liu @ 2011-12-12 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 9 ---------
include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index fd38477..80c9e5c 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -2415,7 +2415,6 @@ static void nand_set_defaults(struct nand_chip *chip, int busw)
chip->controller = &chip->hwcontrol;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION
static u16 onfi_crc16(u16 crc, u8 const *p, size_t len)
{
int i;
@@ -2493,14 +2492,6 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd,
return 1;
}
-#else
-static inline int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd,
- struct nand_chip *chip,
- int *busw)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
static void nand_flash_detect_non_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd,
struct nand_chip *chip,
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
index 1cdc7ae..fc35102 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/nand.h
@@ -472,9 +472,7 @@ struct nand_chip {
uint8_t cellinfo;
int badblockpos;
int onfi_version;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION
struct nand_onfi_params onfi_params;
-#endif
int state;
--
1.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 9:49 ` Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip Shengzhou Liu
2012-01-10 23:29 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Scott Wood
2011-12-12 18:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Scott Wood
1 sibling, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shengzhou Liu @ 2011-12-12 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
- fix NAND_CMD_READID command for ONFI detect.
- add NAND_CMD_PARAM command to read the ONFI parameter page.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
index 4d1e527..99d1061 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
@@ -340,18 +340,21 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
/* READID must read all 5 possible bytes while CEB is active */
case NAND_CMD_READID:
- vdbg("fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD_READID.\n");
+ case NAND_CMD_PARAM:
+ vdbg("fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD 0x%x.\n", command);
out_be32(&lbc->fir, (FIR_OP_CW0 << FIR_OP0_SHIFT) |
(FIR_OP_UA << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
(FIR_OP_RBW << FIR_OP2_SHIFT));
- out_be32(&lbc->fcr, NAND_CMD_READID << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT);
- /* 5 bytes for manuf, device and exts */
- out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 5);
- ctrl->read_bytes = 5;
+ out_be32(&lbc->fcr, command << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT);
+ /*
+ * although currently it's 8 bytes for READID, we always read
+ * the maximum 256 bytes(for PARAM)
+ */
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 256);
+ ctrl->read_bytes = 256;
ctrl->use_mdr = 1;
- ctrl->mdr = 0;
-
+ ctrl->mdr = column;
set_addr(mtd, 0, 0, 0);
fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
return;
--
1.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 9:49 ` Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 20:14 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:29 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Scott Wood
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shengzhou Liu @ 2011-12-12 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer RAM. In order
to support the Nand flash chip with pagesize larger than 2K bytes,
we read/write 2k data repeatedly by issuing FIR_OP_RB/FIR_OP_WB and save
them to a large buffer.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <b35362@freescale.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
index 99d1061..a2d8067 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ struct fsl_elbc_mtd {
struct device *dev;
int bank; /* Chip select bank number */
u8 __iomem *vbase; /* Chip select base virtual address */
- int page_size; /* NAND page size (0=512, 1=2048) */
unsigned int fmr; /* FCM Flash Mode Register value */
};
@@ -85,6 +84,8 @@ struct fsl_elbc_ctrl {
unsigned int mdr; /* UPM/FCM Data Register value */
unsigned int use_mdr; /* Non zero if the MDR is to be set */
unsigned int oob; /* Non zero if operating on OOB data */
+ char *buffer; /* Just used when pagesize is greater */
+ /* than FCM RAM 2K limitation */
};
/* These map to the positions used by the FCM hardware ECC generator */
@@ -159,6 +160,35 @@ static struct nand_bbt_descr bbt_mirror_descr = {
.pattern = mirror_pattern,
};
+static void io_to_buffer(struct mtd_info *mtd, int subpage, int oob)
+{
+ struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = chip->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
+ void *src, *dst;
+ int len = oob ? 64 : 2048;
+
+ /* for emulating 4096+ bytes NAND using 2048-byte FCM RAM */
+ dst = ctrl->buffer + (oob ? mtd->writesize : 0) + subpage * len;
+ src = ctrl->addr + (oob ? 2048 : 0);
+ memcpy_fromio(dst, src, len);
+}
+
+static void buffer_to_io(struct mtd_info *mtd, int subpage, int oob)
+{
+ struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = chip->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
+ void *src, *dst;
+ int len = oob ? 64 : 2048;
+
+ src = ctrl->buffer + (oob ? mtd->writesize : 0) + subpage * len;
+ dst = ctrl->addr + (oob ? 2048 : 0);
+ memcpy_toio(dst, src, len);
+ /* See the in_8() in fsl_elbc_write_buf() */
+ in_8(ctrl->addr);
+}
+
/*=================================*/
/*
@@ -175,7 +205,7 @@ static void set_addr(struct mtd_info *mtd, int column, int page_addr, int oob)
ctrl->page = page_addr;
- if (priv->page_size) {
+ if (mtd->writesize >= 2048) {
out_be32(&lbc->fbar, page_addr >> 6);
out_be32(&lbc->fpar,
((page_addr << FPAR_LP_PI_SHIFT) & FPAR_LP_PI) |
@@ -194,7 +224,7 @@ static void set_addr(struct mtd_info *mtd, int column, int page_addr, int oob)
/* for OOB data point to the second half of the buffer */
if (oob)
- ctrl->index += priv->page_size ? 2048 : 512;
+ ctrl->index += mtd->writesize;
vdbg("set_addr: bank=%d, ctrl->addr=0x%p (0x%p), "
"index %x, pes %d ps %d\n",
@@ -256,13 +286,14 @@ static int fsl_elbc_run_command(struct mtd_info *mtd)
return ctrl->status == LTESR_CC ? 0 : -EIO;
}
-static void fsl_elbc_do_read(struct nand_chip *chip, int oob)
+static void fsl_elbc_do_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, int oob)
{
+ struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = chip->priv;
struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
fsl_lbc_t *lbc = ctrl->regs;
- if (priv->page_size) {
+ if (mtd->writesize >= 2048) {
out_be32(&lbc->fir,
(FIR_OP_CW0 << FIR_OP0_SHIFT) |
(FIR_OP_CA << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
@@ -295,6 +326,7 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = chip->priv;
struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
fsl_lbc_t *lbc = ctrl->regs;
+ int i, nps = mtd->writesize / 2048;
ctrl->use_mdr = 0;
@@ -319,8 +351,28 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
ctrl->read_bytes = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
ctrl->index += column;
- fsl_elbc_do_read(chip, 0);
+ fsl_elbc_do_read(mtd, 0);
fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+
+ if (mtd->writesize <= 2048)
+ return;
+
+ /* Continue to read the rest bytes if writesize > 2048 */
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, 0, 0);
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, 0, 1);
+ /*
+ * Maybe there are some reasons of FCM hardware timing,
+ * we must insert a FIR_OP_NOP(0x00) before FIR_OP_RB.
+ */
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir, FIR_OP_NOP << FIR_OP0_SHIFT |
+ FIR_OP_RB << FIR_OP1_SHIFT);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < nps; i++) {
+ fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, i, 0);
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, i, 1);
+ }
+
return;
/* READOOB reads only the OOB because no ECC is performed. */
@@ -328,14 +380,35 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
vdbg("fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD_READOOB, page_addr:"
" 0x%x, column: 0x%x.\n", page_addr, column);
- out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, mtd->oobsize - column);
- set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, 1);
+ if (mtd->writesize <= 2048) {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, mtd->oobsize - column);
+ set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, 1);
+ } else {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 64);
+ set_addr(mtd, 0, page_addr, 1);
+ ctrl->index += column;
+ }
ctrl->read_bytes = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
-
- fsl_elbc_do_read(chip, 1);
+ fsl_elbc_do_read(mtd, 1);
fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ if (mtd->writesize <= 2048)
+ return;
+
+ if (column < 64)
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, 0, 1);
+
+ out_be32(&lbc->fpar, in_be32(&lbc->fpar) & ~FPAR_LP_MS);
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir, FIR_OP_RB << FIR_OP1_SHIFT);
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 2112);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < nps; i++) {
+ fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ if (column < (64 * (i + 1)))
+ io_to_buffer(mtd, i, 1);
+ }
+
return;
/* READID must read all 5 possible bytes while CEB is active */
@@ -357,6 +430,8 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
ctrl->mdr = column;
set_addr(mtd, 0, 0, 0);
fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ memcpy_fromio(ctrl->buffer, ctrl->addr, 256);
return;
/* ERASE1 stores the block and page address */
@@ -393,9 +468,28 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
page_addr, column);
ctrl->column = column;
- ctrl->oob = 0;
+ if (column >= mtd->writesize) {
+ /* OOB area */
+ column -= mtd->writesize;
+ ctrl->oob = 1;
+ } else {
+ ctrl->oob = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048) {
+ /* writesize > 2048 */
+ fcr = (NAND_CMD_STATUS << FCR_CMD1_SHIFT) |
+ (NAND_CMD_SEQIN << FCR_CMD2_SHIFT) |
+ (NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG << FCR_CMD3_SHIFT);
+ if (ctrl->oob)
+ fcr |= NAND_CMD_RNDIN << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT;
- if (priv->page_size) {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir,
+ (FIR_OP_CM2 << FIR_OP0_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_CA << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_PA << FIR_OP2_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP3_SHIFT));
+ } else if (mtd->writesize == 2048) {
fcr = (NAND_CMD_SEQIN << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT) |
(NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG << FCR_CMD1_SHIFT);
@@ -417,11 +511,9 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
(FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP4_SHIFT) |
(FIR_OP_CW1 << FIR_OP5_SHIFT));
- if (column >= mtd->writesize) {
+ if (ctrl->oob) {
/* OOB area --> READOOB */
- column -= mtd->writesize;
fcr |= NAND_CMD_READOOB << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT;
- ctrl->oob = 1;
} else if (column < 256) {
/* First 256 bytes --> READ0 */
fcr |= NAND_CMD_READ0 << FCR_CMD0_SHIFT;
@@ -432,12 +524,19 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
}
out_be32(&lbc->fcr, fcr);
- set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, ctrl->oob);
+ if (column >= mtd->writesize && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
+ /* for write oob && writesize > 2048 */
+ set_addr(mtd, 0, page_addr, 0);
+ ctrl->index = column;
+ } else {
+ set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, ctrl->oob);
+ }
return;
}
/* PAGEPROG reuses all of the setup from SEQIN and adds the length */
case NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG: {
+ int pos;
vdbg("fsl_elbc_cmdfunc: NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG "
"writing %d bytes.\n", ctrl->index);
@@ -445,14 +544,71 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
* then set the exact length, otherwise use a full page
* write so the HW generates the ECC.
*/
+
if (ctrl->oob || ctrl->column != 0 ||
- ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize)
- out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index);
- else
+ ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize) {
+ if (ctrl->oob && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 64);
+ } else {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index -
+ ctrl->column);
+ }
+ } else {
out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 0);
+ }
+
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048) {
+ if (!ctrl->oob)
+ buffer_to_io(mtd, 0, 0);
+ buffer_to_io(mtd, 0, 1);
+ }
fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ if (mtd->writesize <= 2048)
+ return;
+
+ if (ctrl->oob) {
+ pos = 2048;
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir,
+ (FIR_OP_CM0 << FIR_OP0_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_UA << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_UA << FIR_OP2_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP3_SHIFT));
+
+ for (i = 1; i < nps; i++) {
+ pos += 2112;
+ ctrl->mdr = pos;
+ ctrl->use_mdr = 1;
+ if (i == nps - 1) {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir,
+ (FIR_OP_CM0 << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_UA << FIR_OP2_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_UA << FIR_OP3_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP4_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_CM3 << FIR_OP5_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_CW1 << FIR_OP6_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_RS << FIR_OP7_SHIFT));
+ }
+ buffer_to_io(mtd, i, 1);
+ fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ }
+ } else {
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir, FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP1_SHIFT);
+ for (i = 1; i < nps; i++) {
+ if (i == nps - 1) {
+ ctrl->use_mdr = 1;
+ out_be32(&lbc->fir,
+ (FIR_OP_WB << FIR_OP1_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_CM3 << FIR_OP2_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_CW1 << FIR_OP3_SHIFT) |
+ (FIR_OP_RS << FIR_OP4_SHIFT));
+ }
+ buffer_to_io(mtd, i, 0);
+ buffer_to_io(mtd, i, 1);
+ fsl_elbc_run_command(mtd);
+ }
+ }
return;
}
@@ -473,6 +629,8 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
* write-protected, even when it is not.
*/
out_8(ctrl->addr, in_8(ctrl->addr) | NAND_STATUS_WP);
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ ctrl->buffer[0] = in_8(ctrl->addr);
return;
/* RESET without waiting for the ready line */
@@ -519,7 +677,11 @@ static void fsl_elbc_write_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u8 *buf, int len)
len = bufsize - ctrl->index;
}
- memcpy_toio(&ctrl->addr[ctrl->index], buf, len);
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ memcpy(&ctrl->buffer[ctrl->index], buf, len);
+ else
+ memcpy_toio(&ctrl->addr[ctrl->index], buf, len);
+
/*
* This is workaround for the weird elbc hangs during nand write,
* Scott Wood says: "...perhaps difference in how long it takes a
@@ -543,8 +705,13 @@ static u8 fsl_elbc_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
/* If there are still bytes in the FCM, then use the next byte. */
- if (ctrl->index < ctrl->read_bytes)
- return in_8(&ctrl->addr[ctrl->index++]);
+ if (ctrl->index < ctrl->read_bytes) {
+ int index = ctrl->index++;
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ return ctrl->buffer[index];
+ else
+ return in_8(&ctrl->addr[index]);
+ }
printf("read_byte beyond end of buffer\n");
return ERR_BYTE;
@@ -564,7 +731,10 @@ static void fsl_elbc_read_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, int len)
return;
avail = min((unsigned int)len, ctrl->read_bytes - ctrl->index);
- memcpy_fromio(buf, &ctrl->addr[ctrl->index], avail);
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ memcpy(buf, &ctrl->buffer[ctrl->index], avail);
+ else
+ memcpy_fromio(buf, &ctrl->addr[ctrl->index], avail);
ctrl->index += avail;
if (len > avail)
@@ -598,9 +768,17 @@ static int fsl_elbc_verify_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd,
return -EINVAL;
}
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
- if (in_8(&ctrl->addr[ctrl->index + i]) != buf[i])
- break;
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048) {
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (ctrl->buffer[ctrl->index + i] != buf[i])
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (in_8(&ctrl->addr[ctrl->index + i]) != buf[i])
+ break;
+ }
+ }
ctrl->index += len;
return i == len && ctrl->status == LTESR_CC ? 0 : -EIO;
@@ -637,6 +815,8 @@ static int fsl_elbc_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip)
* write-protected, even when it is not.
*/
out_8(ctrl->addr, in_8(ctrl->addr) | NAND_STATUS_WP);
+ if (mtd->writesize > 2048)
+ ctrl->buffer[0] = in_8(ctrl->addr);
return fsl_elbc_read_byte(mtd);
}
@@ -666,11 +846,11 @@ static void fsl_elbc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
static struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *elbc_ctrl;
-static void fsl_elbc_ctrl_init(void)
+static int fsl_elbc_ctrl_init(void)
{
elbc_ctrl = kzalloc(sizeof(*elbc_ctrl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!elbc_ctrl)
- return;
+ return -ENOMEM;
elbc_ctrl->regs = LBC_BASE_ADDR;
@@ -684,6 +864,21 @@ static void fsl_elbc_ctrl_init(void)
elbc_ctrl->read_bytes = 0;
elbc_ctrl->index = 0;
elbc_ctrl->addr = NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Freescale FCM controller has a 2KB size limitation of buffer RAM,
+ * so elbc_ctrl->buffer have to be used if pagesize of NAND devices
+ * chip greater than 2048. We malloc a large enough buffer(just max
+ * 8K pagesize for now) at this point, because we don't know pagesize
+ * before calling nand_scan_ident().
+ */
+ elbc_ctrl->buffer = kmalloc(1024 * 8 + 1024, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!elbc_ctrl->buffer) {
+ printf("failed to allocate memory for elbc_ctrl->buffer\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
@@ -692,8 +887,7 @@ int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
uint32_t br = 0, or = 0;
if (!elbc_ctrl) {
- fsl_elbc_ctrl_init();
- if (!elbc_ctrl)
+ if (fsl_elbc_ctrl_init())
return -1;
}
@@ -782,7 +976,6 @@ int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
/* Large-page-specific setup */
if (or & OR_FCM_PGS) {
- priv->page_size = 1;
nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
/* adjust ecc setup if needed */
@@ -796,3 +989,31 @@ int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
return 0;
}
+
+int board_nand_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ struct nand_chip *nand = mtd->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = nand->priv;
+ struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
+
+ /* adjust Option Register and ECC to match Flash page size */
+ if (mtd->writesize == 512) {
+ clrbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
+ } else if (mtd->writesize >= 2048 && mtd->writesize <= 8192) {
+ setbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
+ /* adjust ecc setup if needed */
+ if ((in_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].br) & BR_DECC) ==
+ BR_DECC_CHK_GEN) {
+ nand->ecc.size = 512;
+ nand->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
+ &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
+ nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
+ }
+ } else {
+ printf("%s: page size %d is not supported\n", __func__,
+ mtd->writesize);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.6.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 18:42 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BECF4@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-12-12 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12/12/2011 03:49 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
Why?
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip Shengzhou Liu
@ 2011-12-12 20:14 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BEF66@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-12-12 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12/12/2011 03:49 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer RAM. In order
> to support the Nand flash chip with pagesize larger than 2K bytes,
> we read/write 2k data repeatedly by issuing FIR_OP_RB/FIR_OP_WB and save
> them to a large buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <b35362@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
I've asked you several times what you're planning on doing for bad block
marker migration. I am not going to let you ignore this. NACK until
you have a migration tool, and a scheme for marking the flash as having
been migrated.
Also please mention below the --- what has changed since v1.
> @@ -393,9 +468,28 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
> page_addr, column);
>
> ctrl->column = column;
> - ctrl->oob = 0;
> + if (column >= mtd->writesize) {
> + /* OOB area */
> + column -= mtd->writesize;
> + ctrl->oob = 1;
> + } else {
> + ctrl->oob = 0;
> + }
[snip]
> @@ -432,12 +524,19 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
> }
>
> out_be32(&lbc->fcr, fcr);
> - set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, ctrl->oob);
> + if (column >= mtd->writesize && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
How can column >= mtd->writesize be true at this point? You've already
subtracted it out.
> if (ctrl->oob || ctrl->column != 0 ||
> - ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize)
> - out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index);
> - else
> + ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize) {
> + if (ctrl->oob && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
> + out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 64);
> + } else {
> + out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index -
> + ctrl->column);
> + }
> + } else {
> out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 0);
> + }
Again, if we're going to make an API assumption that we get either a
full page access or a full OOB access, then make the assumption fully.
Don't half-implement partial accessses.
> +int board_nand_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *nand = mtd->priv;
> + struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = nand->priv;
> + struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
> +
> + /* adjust Option Register and ECC to match Flash page size */
> + if (mtd->writesize == 512) {
> + clrbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
> + } else if (mtd->writesize >= 2048 && mtd->writesize <= 8192) {
> + setbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
> + /* adjust ecc setup if needed */
> + if ((in_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].br) & BR_DECC) ==
> + BR_DECC_CHK_GEN) {
> + nand->ecc.size = 512;
Please find some way to indent the continuation line so it doesn't line
up with the if-body.
> + nand->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
> + &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
> + nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
Those oob layouts won't be quite right for larger page sizes.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BEF66@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
@ 2011-12-14 17:54 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216C4934@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-12-14 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12/14/2011 01:30 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:14 AM
>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685
>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Gala Kumar-B11780; Liu Shuo-B35362
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to
>> support 4k pagesize Nand chip
>>
>> I've asked you several times what you're planning on doing for bad block
>> marker migration. I am not going to let you ignore this. NACK until you
>> have a migration tool, and a scheme for marking the flash as having been
>> migrated.
>>
>
> [Shengzhou]
> This is the first time that you asked me about bad block marker migration.
> You asked LiuShuo several times in Linux mail list, as I am not in that thread
> And not known about it until Liushuo told me.
> As LiuShuo will do it, so I am not planning on it.
Ah, sorry about that.
Still, I'd like to see it done, whoever does it, before this gets
merged. I don't want people to be able to accidentally start using it
without doing migration.
>>> + nand->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
>>> + &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
>>> + nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
>>
>> Those oob layouts won't be quite right for larger page sizes.
>>
>> -Scott
> [Shengzhou] It's the same with what Linux does. What's the right?
I think we need to explicitly define 4096 and 8192 variants, with the
extra eccpos/oobfree. Or generate them programatically.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BECF4@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
@ 2011-12-14 18:08 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-12-14 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12/13/2011 08:37 PM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 2:42 AM
>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685
>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Gala Kumar-B11780
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove
>> CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection
>>
>> On 12/12/2011 03:49 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
>>> remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> -Scott
>
> [Shengzhou]
> There is not necessity to CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION now.
> We should always enable ONFI detection as what Linux does.
Linux has fewer concerns about code size than U-Boot does.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216C4934@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
@ 2011-12-15 17:36 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-12-15 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 12/15/2011 04:53 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:14 AM
>>>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685
>>>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Gala Kumar-B11780; Liu Shuo-B35362
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to
>>>> support 4k pagesize Nand chip
>>
>>>>> + nand->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
>>>>> + &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
>>>>> + nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
>>>>
>>>> Those oob layouts won't be quite right for larger page sizes.
>>>>
>>>> -Scott
>>> [Shengzhou] It's the same with what Linux does. What's the right?
>>
>> I think we need to explicitly define 4096 and 8192 variants, with the
>> extra eccpos/oobfree. Or generate them programatically.
>>
>> -Scott
>
> [Shengzhou]
> You mean we should define something like below?
> static struct nand_ecclayout fsl_elbc_oob_lp_4k_eccm0 = {
> .eccbytes = 24,
> .eccpos = {6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 24, 38, 39, 40, 54, 55, 56,
> 70, 71, 72, 86, 87, 88, 102, 103, 104, 118, 119, 120},
> .oobfree = { {1, 5}, {9, 13}, {25, 13}, {41, 13}, {57, 7},...... },
> };
> static struct nand_ecclayout fsl_elbc_oob_lp_8k_eccm0 = {........};
Yes.
> eLBC RM says:
> ECC is checked/calculated over 512-Byte blocks. A 24-bit ECC is assigned to spare region bytes at offsets
> (N ? 16) + 6 through (N ? 16) + 8 for spare region N, N = 0?3. (for ECCM=0 case)
>
> Here RM just says N is 0?3, but it should be 0-7 for 4096 case,
Well, yes, this is a hack to do things that the hardware doesn't
officially support.
> hardware ECC doesn't generate ECC in position of N=4,5,6,7.
It will. It just thinks that N=0,1,2,3.
> fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0 and fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 are controller-associated, not device-associated,
Then why do we have separate small and large page versions?
> I think we don't need define 4096 and 8192 variants, it's emulating 4096/8192 case by
> the existing 2K layout of fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0 and fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1.
> Please correct me if any wrong understanding.
It's supporting 4096/8192 by repeating the 2048 layout multiple times.
This repetition is not captured by the existing nand_ecclayout.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip Shengzhou Liu
@ 2012-01-10 23:29 ` Scott Wood
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2012-01-10 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:49:57PM +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> - fix NAND_CMD_READID command for ONFI detect.
> - add NAND_CMD_PARAM command to read the ONFI parameter page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-10 23:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-12 9:49 [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add function board_nand_init_tail() for some special NAND controllers Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] mtd/nand: Fixup for support ONFI detect Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 9:49 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip Shengzhou Liu
2011-12-12 20:14 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BEF66@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
2011-12-14 17:54 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216C4934@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
2011-12-15 17:36 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-10 23:29 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] mtd/nand: Add ONFI support for FSL NAND controller Scott Wood
2011-12-12 18:42 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] mtd/nand: remove CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION to enable ONFI detection Scott Wood
[not found] ` <3F453DDFF675A64A89321A1F352810216BECF4@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net>
2011-12-14 18:08 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox