From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:45:26 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] nand_spl_simple: store ecc data on the stack
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXmQ=nZj1+CjH1QqamhAydnozhUm6s-zMNsmMgkoE8iuBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1323624146-8402-1-git-send-email-sbabic@denx.de>
	<1323798615-23154-1-git-send-email-sbabic@denx.de>
	<CA+M6bX=j+=UBkZ-VGoAJgFtfap+sLp4i2JypDSjJ_z-bCbw6sQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111213181839.B29348223E@gemini.denx.de>
	<CA+M6bXmQ=nZj1+CjH1QqamhAydnozhUm6s-zMNsmMgkoE8iuBg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EE79D46.7000302@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 12/13/2011 12:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> So, we have various characteristics of the NAND chip that need to be
> described for SPL.  Today we do CONFIG_SYS_NAND... but they're
> unchanged in every implementation and are calculated from other
> per-board values.  So to avoid duplication in each config file, we
> drop them from there and use them only locally #define calculate them
> in the file that needs them.  Since they're still system specific
> values, I had suggested calling them SYS_... but I wasn't sure what
> the right namespace is.  I had a recollection that using CONFIG_
> outside of config files was a bad idea.

These symbols are not in a header file -- how about just plain ECCSTEPS
and ECCTOTAL?

-Scott