From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:48:51 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] Some thoughts on SPL
In-Reply-To: <CA+M6bXkVT-DyKUKtadgFw=VNe6Sp-OWpM4S5VX3V6evUvTfFig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKON4Ow_BvnZGHThPtA__W9f3h3V+-pVmvv8-gyUS4SgMnJ59Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+M6bXkVT-DyKUKtadgFw=VNe6Sp-OWpM4S5VX3V6evUvTfFig@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EF0F4B3.5010001@freescale.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 12/20/2011 09:38 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> So, in chasing down another problem I was having (that turned out
> unrelated) I just made SPL use the full NAND stack.  It wouldn't be
> difficult to add CONFIG_SPL_FULL_NAND_SUPPORT 

How about CONFIG_SPL_NAND_FULL?

> (and either keep the
> existing name for nand_spl_simple or rename to
> CONFIG_SPL_MIN_NAND_SUPPORT).

Please keep it as CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SIMPLE.  There will be other NAND SPL
implementations besides "simple" and "full" once we migrate over the
existing nand_spl users.

-Scott