From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:00:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2801F9.20006@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F27F7C6.9020507@boundarydevices.com>
On 31/01/2012 15:16, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 02:31 AM, Jason Hui wrote:
>> Eric,
>>
Hi Eric,
> Ouch! It's all about the GPIO numbers...
>
> This occurred when I re-based to Stefano's tree and will require
> another patch to keep the BANK:OFFSET numbering scheme. There's a
> patch lingering in Dirk's tree that defines IMX_GPIO_NR() in gpio.h.
>
> See http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/116866.html
> for details.
Extending the thread you report: the only macro defined in MX I can find
is for MX27:
#define MXC_GPIO_PORT_TO_NUM(port, bit) (((port - 1) << 5) + (bit & 0x1f))
but we do not need to stick with it ;-). Using a more general GPIO_ as
you proposed is better because we could extend the same macros to other
family.
>
> I was hoping to get some feedback before generating a patch and
> revising this patch (and removing GPIO_3_19 macro):
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/116874.html
>
> That said, I'll revise and re-send along with a patch adding
> support for:
> GPIO_NUMBER(port,index)
> GPIO_PORT(number)
> GPIO_INDEX(number)
Agree with your proposal, good idea !
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-31 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 19:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] mxc_spi refactoring (for mx6q and mx6qsabrelite) Eric Nelson
2012-01-30 19:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mxc_spi: move machine specifics into CPU headers Eric Nelson
2012-01-31 9:15 ` Jason Hui
2012-01-30 19:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mx6q: Add support for ECSPI through mxc_spi driver Eric Nelson
2012-01-31 9:20 ` Jason Hui
2012-01-30 19:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform Eric Nelson
2012-01-31 9:31 ` Jason Hui
2012-01-31 14:16 ` Eric Nelson
2012-01-31 15:00 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
2012-01-31 17:50 ` [U-Boot] MX6q SPI refactoring and related patches Eric Nelson
2012-01-31 6:51 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] mxc_spi refactoring (for mx6q and mx6qsabrelite) Jason Liu
2012-01-31 6:59 ` Jason Hui
2012-01-31 13:39 ` Eric Nelson
2012-02-01 4:49 ` Jason Hui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F2801F9.20006@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox