From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:35:21 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects In-Reply-To: <4F29223C.8080401@denx.de> References: <1328032330-20883-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> <1328032330-20883-6-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com> <201201311311.05336.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F283D9F.2020506@boundarydevices.com> <4F29223C.8080401@denx.de> Message-ID: <4F292379.6060105@de.bosch.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 01.02.2012 12:30, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 31/01/2012 20:14, Eric Nelson wrote: >> On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: >>>> Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select >>>> to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: >>>> U-Boot> sf probe >>>> instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto >>>> the chip-select. Otherwise, this command-line would be needed >>>> to specify GP3:19 on SabreLite: >>>> U-Boot> sf probe 0x5300 >>>> >>>> Patch 2 provides a description of usage and configuration of >>>> CONFIG_CMD_SF. >>> you can drop these two SF patches from your mx6q series. i don't want >>> to keep >>> checking to see if you've updated them :p. >>> -mike >> I figured as much, but I can't really test them without the rest of the >> series... > > It does not matter - Mike, what do you think if I merge the whole > patchset into u-boot-imx ? Else the mx6qsabrelite board cannot be built > until all patches will be merged by Wolfgang. +1 Thanks Dirk