From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] flash post test
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:59:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F305B45.10104@aribaud.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F305A5A.80607@freescale.com>
Hi Scott,
Le 06/02/2012 23:55, Scott Wood a ?crit :
> On 02/06/2012 04:23 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> Le 06/02/2012 05:57, vaibhav kothari a ?crit :
>>> hi albert
>>>
>>> Yes,actually there is already support of flash test in POST of latest
>>> uboot.They are testing flash on every power on so am I for my board.But i
>>> don't want to disturb sectors in which uboot code relies. Can you help me
>>> here?
>>
>> I am no NAND specialist, but I do hope NAND POST tests are pure read
>> tests and thus are not affected by poweroffs (and can actually test any
>> part of NAND).
>
> NAND has a property called "read disturb", where excessively reading a
> sector without writing to it can eventually cause data loss. U-Boot is
> already read once per boot, but reading it a second time could halve the
> expected lifetime. Data managed by something like ubi is be scrubbed in
> a way that avoids this, but U-Boot itself is not usually managed in this
> way (boot hardware/rom does not understand ubi).
I *did* say I am not a NAND expert. :)
Thanks Scott. But then, isn't NAND testing a kind of catch-22, where by
actually tesing if NAND works it one ends up weakening it either through
read disturb, or simply through writes?
> -Scott
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 9:27 [U-Boot] flash post test vk
2012-02-03 21:32 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-06 4:57 ` vaibhav kothari
2012-02-06 22:23 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-06 22:55 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-06 22:59 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2012-02-06 23:02 ` Scott Wood
2012-02-07 4:32 ` vaibhav kothari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F305B45.10104@aribaud.net \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox