[U-Boot] mx6: consolidating and extending anadig/analog/anatop register defs

[Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>]

On 02/14/2012 02:07 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 02/14/2012 01:37 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Hi, Wolfgang,
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de
>>>>> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang
>>>>> Grandegger Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:08 PM
>>>>> To: U-Boot
>>>>> Subject: [U-Boot] mx6: consolidating and extending
>>>>> anadig/analog/anatop register defs
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> for the USB support on MX6Q, I'm trying to consolidate and extend
>>>>> the register definitions for the ANADIG registers. Unfortunately,
>>>>> three different names are used for the same registers: ANADIG,
>>>>> analog and ANATOP. Any idea what the names do stand for and what
>>>>> would be the most appropriate one. Apart from that, we should have
>>>>> a separate structure and header file for these registers.
>>>>> Currently, they are added to the CCM regs.
>>>>
>>>> The register definition in the CCM according to the RM as followings:
>>>> Addresses: CCM_analog_PLL_SYS is 0h base + 0h offset = 0000_0000h
>>>> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_SET is 0h base + 4h offset = 0000_0004h
>>>> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_CLR is 0h base + 8h offset = 0000_0008h
>>>> CCM_analog_PLL_SYS_TOG is 0h base + Ch offset = 0000_000Ch
>>>>
>>>> Thus, I put the register definition into the CCM parts.
>>>
>>> This again resembles MX28 ... damn, can't we share some parts of MX28
>>> for MX6Q ?
>>>
>>> Fabio, I think I'll need one too, this is getting weird ;-)
>>
>> Unfortunately, I did not get hold of a RM yet :(.
> 
> RM? Who's that?

Reference Manual!

>  It's still under NDA,
>> I believe. Therefore I will postpone my "consolidation" activities for
>> the time being.
> 
> Sorry, I don't intent to hinder your efforts, I'm just seeing a pattern :)
> 
> The USB support patch I sent does work, as Dirk
>> confirmed, and therefore I suggest to apply it as intermediate solution.
> 
> Well ... All right then. Though my sense for perfect solution is hurting a lot ;-)

Well, that's OK and I realized some kind of mess as well, which should
be fixed sooner than later.

Wolfgang.