[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: enable Thumb build

Aneesh V
2012-02-23T17:28:36Z

On Thursday 23 February 2012 08:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2012 08:39:43 Aneesh V wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm/config.mk
>> +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk
>>
>> -# Explicitly specifiy 32-bit ARM ISA since toolchain default can be
>> -mthumb: +# Choose between ARM/Thumb instruction sets
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD),y)
>> +PF_CPPFLAGS_ARM := $(call cc-option, -mthumb -mthumb-interwork,\
>> + $(call cc-option,-marm,)\
>> + $(call cc-option,-mno-thumb-interwork,)\
>> + )
>> +else
>> PF_CPPFLAGS_ARM := $(call cc-option,-marm,)
>> +PF_CPPFLAGS_ARM += $(call cc-option,-mno-thumb-interwork,)
>
> this 2nd part is no good. "+=" is not the same thing as ":=".

I don't understand the difference. '+=' is done after ':=' right?

>
> might be simpler to do:
> PF_CPPFLAGS_MARM := $(call cc-option,-marm)
> PF_CPPFLAGS_THUMB := $(call cc-option,-mthumb -mthumb-interwork)
> PF_CPPFLAGS_NO_THUMB := $(call cc-option,-mno-thumb-interwork)
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD),y)
> PF_CPPFLAGS_ARM = $(PF_CPPFLAGS_THUMB)
> else
> PF_CPPFLAGS_ARM = $(PF_CPPFLAGS_MARM) $(PF_CPPFLAGS_NO_THUMB)
> endif
> -mike

Are you trying to avoid all '+='. If so, why?