From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:37:19 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] net: fec_mxc: allow use with cache enabled
In-Reply-To: <201203051859.21952.marex@denx.de>
References: <1330729572-12642-1-git-send-email-eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
	<201203051639.57986.marex@denx.de>
	<4F54E1FB.4090000@boundarydevices.com>
	<201203051859.21952.marex@denx.de>
Message-ID: <4F5507DF.4060708@boundarydevices.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 03/05/2012 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Eric Nelson,
>
>> On 03/05/2012 08:39 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Eric Nelson,
>>>
>>>> On 03/04/2012 06:49 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/2012 04:39 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>> +			 * Invalidate data cache over the buffer
>>>>>>>> +			 */
>>>>>>>> +			addr = (uint32_t)frame;
>>>>>>>> +			size = roundup(frame_length,
>>>
>>> CONFIG_FEC_DATA_ALIGNMENT);
>>>
>>>>>>>> +			invalidate_dcache_range(addr, addr + size);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DTTO here, frame length might not be aligned properly, or will it be?
>>>>>>> Network stack must be properly analyzed here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The hardware won't return an unaligned value here, so this should be
>>>>>> good.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure? You can't receive frame aligned to 8 bytes boundary?
>>>>
>>>> Unless I'm missing something, received packet start addresses are
>>>> defined by the driver in fec_rbd_init(), the code just modified to use
>>>> memalign, so we're good here.
>>>
>>> Ok, that's good then. I'll skim through this driver one more time tonight
>>> and see what comes out from it.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I just sent V2.
>
> I can't seem to find it, did you really send it?
>
Apparently not.

I must've fat-fingered the 'send-to' line.