From: Amit Virdi <amit.virdi@st.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:36:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F55FDBE.2000904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4DFD0C.4010707@st.com>
Hello Mike and Marek,
On 2/29/2012 3:55 PM, Amit Virdi wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> On 2/28/2012 6:26 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Monday 27 February 2012 15:53:29 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On Monday 27 February 2012 08:14:26 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/25/2012 3:42 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>>>>>> Le 24/02/2012 12:58, Amit Virdi a ?crit :
>>>>>>>> Packed attribute is forcing a bytewise write on device registers,
>>>>>>>> there by, resulting in a misbehavior on gcc-4.4.1.
>>>>>>>> Reverting the structures to non-packed
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If (just asking, not asserting) the issue is caused by fields being
>>>>>>> u8 where u8 access is not possible, then should you not make the
>>>>>>> fields u16 / u32 according to access requirements?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is not with the fields being of a different width. AFAIK,
>>>>>> the packed attribute changes the generated code to access even the
>>>>>> word field elements in a byte by byte manner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Infact, there is a discussion on lkml that I can point
>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/27/278
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems that the discussion did not lead to a conclusion but it was
>>>>>> sensible (at least for ARM) to remove the packed attribute from this
>>>>>> structure
>>>>>
>>>>> What does the USB spec say ? It might be a HW bug?
>>>>
>>>> it isn't covered by the USB spec. these are structs for hardware
>>>> registers in the EHCI usb host controller.
>>>
>>> I see ... so replacing them with unions of accessors where it colides
>>> might
>>> work ?
>>
>> i'm not entirely sure what you're asking, but i think you're pointing
>> to the
>> right answer: drivers/usb/host/ehci.h:ehci_{read,write}l() should
>> *not* be
>> casting/derferencing the pointers directly. they should instead be using
>> standard {read,write}l() funcs from asm/io.h.
>>
>> Amit: can you post a new patch that does that instead ? don't touch the
>> packed attribute, but change ehci_readl() to use readl() and
>> ehci_writel() to
>> use writel() ?
>
> I'll make the changes and post the patch after testing successfully.
>
I did the changes suggested by you and tested the build. The issue
didn't come up. Then I reverted the code to the original (attributes
retained and ehci directly de-referencing the pointers. The issue didn't
come here too.
Today, I used armv7-linux-gcc (GCC) v4.6.2
So I suspect there has been some fix done in the GCC.
Now, even with the packed attributes, the word fields are accessed
word-by-word in contrast to the earlier observed behavior
(byte-by-byte). I could see ldr and str in the disassembly.
May be, we can discard this patch and keep drivers/usb/host/ehci.h intact.
Thanks
Amit Virdi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 11:58 [U-Boot] [PATCH] USB:host: Attribute packed removed from usb structures Amit Virdi
2012-02-24 19:18 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 10:02 ` Amit Virdi
2012-02-27 18:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-25 10:12 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-02-27 7:16 ` Vipin Kumar
2012-02-27 13:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-27 18:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-27 20:53 ` Marek Vasut
2012-02-28 0:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-02-29 10:25 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 12:06 ` Amit Virdi [this message]
2012-03-06 12:51 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-07 8:30 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 11:38 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-07 12:12 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-06 16:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 8:23 ` Amit Virdi
2012-03-07 13:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-03-07 13:49 ` Amit Virdi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F55FDBE.2000904@st.com \
--to=amit.virdi@st.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox