From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:13:19 -0600 Subject: [U-Boot] OneNAND custodian In-Reply-To: <20120307100235.773faf38@lmajewski.digital.local> References: <1320914477-27885-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1331016880-28873-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <4F565D21.8070402@freescale.com> <20120307100235.773faf38@lmajewski.digital.local> Message-ID: <4F57C15F.10800@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 03/07/2012 03:02 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:53:21 +0100 > Scott Wood wrote: > >> On 03/06/2012 12:54 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> This patch sets add board dependent onenand probes. >>> >>> Several fixes for GONI and Exynos4210 (C210_universal) targets have >>> been added. >>> >>> Tested at: >>> Samsung S5PC110 GONI >>> Samsung Exynos4210 (S5PC210 Universal) >>> >>> Lukasz Majewski (4): >>> onenand:samsung Target dependent OneNAND chip probe function >>> onenand:samsung OneNAND chip probe functions added for GONI and >>> Exynos4210 >>> onenand: Replace ONENAND_IS_MLC() test with ONENAND_HAS_4KB() >>> onenand: samsung: Enable support OneNAND support at Samsung's >>> Exynos4210 >> >> Is anyone interested in being a OneNAND custodian? >> >> I've taken some OneNAND patches in the past, but it's a completely >> separate subsystem from NAND, and nobody seems interested in changing >> that. I not only have no hardware, but also no documentation other >> than marketing materials. I lack the context to properly review >> OneNAND patches. >> >> -Scott > > Hi Scott, > > Some of our targets still use that kind of memory (Goni and Universal > C210). > I can volunteer as a OneNAND custodian. Wolfgang, is this OK with you? -Scott