[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: Don't use printf() in SPL builds

[Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>]

Hello Simon,

Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Sughosh,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Sughosh Ganu <urwithsughosh@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi Simon,
>>
>> On Sat Mar 03, 2012 at 12:33:15PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> raise() likes to call printf() if it is available, but in SPL builds it
>>> either is not available, or adds a large chunk to the resulting image
>>> size.
>>>
>>> So don't call it even if it is available.
>>>
>>> This change reduces SPL size from 10KB to 6.3KB on hawkboard, for
>>> example, using generic relocation.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c |    3 ++-
>>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c b/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c
>>> index 2028dbd..44eebe0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c
>>> @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
>>>
>>>  int raise (int signum)
>>>  {
>>> -#if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) || defined(CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT)
>>> +     /* Even if printf() is available, it's large. Punt it for SPL builds */
>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
>>>       printf("raise: Signal # %d caught\n", signum);
>>>  #endif
>>   I tested with this change on hawkboard, and after applying this
>>   change, the spl size increase is 412 bytes against the 4k increase
>>   that we get with libcommon changes introduced. So this patch works
>>   fine.
> 
> OK good.
> 
>>   Can you please check if libcommon support is needed for the
>>   cam_enc_4xx board -- your relocation patch series did not add
>>   CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT to this board. This will affect my
>>   patch to initialise gd and bd objects for hawkboard. Please let me
>>   know, and i will spin a patch accordingly.
> 
> Yes I think this board needs both of these:
> 
> #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
> #define CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT

I posted a patch, which adds CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT, see

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/145280/

for this board. Build/works fine without CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
maybe I miss something?

Builded with ELDK-4.2 and ELDK-5.1 based on commit:

commit e37ae40e9dec9af417c19de72f76becebf160730
Author: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue Nov 1 06:28:21 2011 +0000

    image: Support FDTs already loaded at their load address

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany