From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:10:43 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6] BOOT: Add "bootz" command to boot Linux zImage on ARM In-Reply-To: <201203152129.33296.marex@denx.de> References: <201203152005.03198.marex@denx.de> <4F62479F.8070509@gmail.com> <201203152129.33296.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <4F625AD3.6050107@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 03/15/2012 03:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Rob Herring, > >> On 03/15/2012 02:05 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> Dear Rob Herring, >>> >>>> On 03/15/2012 02:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> From: Marek Vasut >>>>> >>>>> This command boots Linux zImage from where the zImage is loaded to. >>>>> Passing initrd and fdt is supported. >>>> >>>> This is great! However, the initrd is still in the u-boot image format, >>>> right? >>>> >>>> If a raw initrd is supported, then we could get rid of flash-kernel on >>>> disk-based debian/ubuntu systems. The file size is known from the >>>> filesystem, but then needs to get to the bootz command somehow. >>> >>> Yes. Initrd still needs a bit of work, ideas? >> > > You lost some people in the Cc ;-) > They weren't in the original email header, only in the commit log as Cc's. >> How about: >> >> bootz [ [ []]] > > What about bootz [:] > > example: bootz 0x12000000 0x13000000:0x40000 0x14000000 > Sure. That works for me. >> >> I changed the order so the size can be optional without resorting to >> using a "-". Then no size means u-boot image format. >> >> File load commands would need to set loadsize env var. > > If you load kernel after initrd, that's screw things up. Yes, but you already have to be aware of some commands which will change env vars. This has to be script-able to be useful. The only other way I see is adding a command to get the size of a file. Perhaps the ls commands when given a single file can do that. Rob >> >> Another idea is to prepend the u-boot image header on file loading. This >> would need some way to disable the crc check and specify any other data. >> It would probably be hard to do without changing existing commands. > > Naw, this is weird. What do you think about my idea with the addr:size stuff? >> >> Rob > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut