From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Patchwork housekeeping
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:21:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6B5178.2040207@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALButC+gO1prxBhpKH=SKS+cVbN-vQqVN4tJUUTn3AfJf1SovA@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/21/2012 09:58 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
> Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados,
>
> I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect
> a rather large amount of cruft.
>
> I occasionally jump onto patchwork and do a little housekeeping by marking
> updated patches as 'Superceeded' and anything applied by Wolfgang as
> 'Accepted' (There may be a few patches that have been applied to custodian
> tress that I marked as 'Accepted' when really they should have been marked
> as 'Awaiting Upstream')
>
> I really don't mind doing this housekeeping, but I would like to make a
> few suggestions that will make the work a little easier:
>
> - If you are a custodian:
> o When you apply a patch to your repo, can you please assign it to
> yourself in patchwork and set it to 'Awaiting Upstream'
> o Reply to the ML with 'Applied to <repo>/<branch>'
> o When you send a pull request, create a bundle with all the patches
> that are to be pulled (you can create the bundle early and add
> patches as you apply them)
> o When Wolfgang pulls your repo, go to the bundle and mark all the
> patches 'Accepted'
A while back I recall it being established that patches should be marked
"accepted" when they go into the custodian repo -- has this changed?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 2:58 [U-Boot] Patchwork housekeeping Graeme Russ
2012-03-22 6:45 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-22 11:15 ` Graeme Russ
2012-03-22 11:35 ` Marek Vasut
2012-03-22 15:08 ` Tom Rini
2012-03-22 16:09 ` McClintock Matthew-B29882
2012-03-22 17:22 ` Tom Rini
2012-03-22 19:15 ` Khem Raj
2012-03-22 16:21 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2012-03-26 17:30 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2012-03-26 17:36 ` Andy Fleming
2012-03-26 17:49 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6B5178.2040207@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox