From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:21:12 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] Patchwork housekeeping In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F6B5178.2040207@freescale.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 03/21/2012 09:58 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados, > > I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect > a rather large amount of cruft. > > I occasionally jump onto patchwork and do a little housekeeping by marking > updated patches as 'Superceeded' and anything applied by Wolfgang as > 'Accepted' (There may be a few patches that have been applied to custodian > tress that I marked as 'Accepted' when really they should have been marked > as 'Awaiting Upstream') > > I really don't mind doing this housekeeping, but I would like to make a > few suggestions that will make the work a little easier: > > - If you are a custodian: > o When you apply a patch to your repo, can you please assign it to > yourself in patchwork and set it to 'Awaiting Upstream' > o Reply to the ML with 'Applied to /' > o When you send a pull request, create a bundle with all the patches > that are to be pulled (you can create the bundle early and add > patches as you apply them) > o When Wolfgang pulls your repo, go to the bundle and mark all the > patches 'Accepted' A while back I recall it being established that patches should be marked "accepted" when they go into the custodian repo -- has this changed? -Scott