From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: mx6q_sabrelite: add SATA bindings
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:59:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F70A05C.7020004@boundarydevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F70725F.8080105@denx.de>
On 03/26/2012 06:42 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 26/03/2012 15:35, Eric Nelson wrote:
>> On 03/26/2012 01:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> On 26/03/2012 01:00, Eric Nelson wrote:
>>>> V2 has been stripped of the board-independent changes and
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMD_SATA
>>>> +
>>>> +int setup_sata(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int rval = enable_sata_clock();
>>>
>>> What about to return at this point if there is an error ?
>>>
>> I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean re-structure the code with
>> two returns like this?
>
> No, much easier - I find the code is easy to understand if it looks like
> if the function returns immediately in case of error.
>
> if (do_something())
> return ERROR;
>
> < code when no error happens>
>
> Your enable_sata_clock() return only -1 in case of error. You could
> easy write:
>
> if (enable_sata_clock())
> return -1 (or better a value in errno.h)
>
The choice of error code is better made inside enable_sata_clock(),
although I'm not really sure what error code to choose.
The error occurs if the PLL fails to lock and would indicate that
something's horribly wrong.
I'm guessing -EIO is probably the right choice.
If you agree, I'll send V2 of "i.MX6: add enable_sata_clock()" and
V3 of "i.MX6: mx6q_sabrelite: add SATA bindings".
Please advise,
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/120899.html>
2012-03-25 23:00 ` [U-Boot] (no subject) Eric Nelson
2012-03-25 23:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] i.MX6: add enable_sata_clock() Eric Nelson
2012-03-25 23:00 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] i.MX6: mx6q_sabrelite: add SATA bindings Eric Nelson
2012-03-26 8:35 ` Stefano Babic
2012-03-26 13:35 ` Eric Nelson
2012-03-26 13:42 ` Stefano Babic
2012-03-26 16:59 ` Eric Nelson [this message]
2012-04-25 23:12 ` Eric Nelson
2012-03-25 23:10 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/2] " Eric Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F70A05C.7020004@boundarydevices.com \
--to=eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox