From: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] Adds driver for Xilinx' xps_spi SPI controller.
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:56:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F79CC28.6080605@threespeedlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203312142.35525.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Hi Marek,
On 31/03/12 12:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Graeme Smecher,
>
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> On 18/09/10 01:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Graeme Smecher,
>>>
>>> In message<1280955847-2999-1-git-send-email-graeme.smecher@mail.mcgill.ca>
> you wrote:
>>>> This code differs in only trivial ways from the altera_spi driver. It
>>>> plays nice with Thomas Chou's mmc_spi driver, as well as with SPI
>>>> flash.
>>> Hm... if the core really differs in only trivial ways from the
>>> altera_spi driver, then why do we need a duplication of that code?
>>>
>>> Can we plase have a single driver source that supports both instead?
>> Hm... It's possible to combine xilinx_spi.c and altera_spi.c. However, I
>> suspect joining them will make maintenance more complicated rather than
>> simpler. I can't, for example, test a combined driver on Altera hardware
>> (and the Altera maintainer will likely have the same problem with Xilinx
>> hardware.)
>>
>> My guess is that most SPI interfaces are nearly identical at a register
>> level, especially for drivers that don't support interrupts and other
>> complications. (See mxc_spi.c for another example.) Xilinx and Altera's
>> SPI interfaces are just two examples that happen to both be FPGA-based
>> -- I could probably have adapted any of the other SPI drivers instead.
>>
>> Are you sure combining drivers is the most logical approach? Let me
>> know, and I'll have a crack at it.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Graeme
> What was the conclusion here? Shall I drop the patch or will you submit a
> rebased version?
Please drop the patch for now, since I'm not in a position to maintain
it. The trail of bread-crumbs on the mailing list is a good compromise
until someone (me, later on?) steps up.
thanks,
Graeme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-03 15:47 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Adds driver for Xilinx' xps_spi SPI controller Graeme Smecher
2010-08-03 17:59 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-04 21:01 ` Graeme Smecher
2010-08-04 21:04 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] " Graeme Smecher
2010-08-17 16:27 ` Graeme Smecher
2010-08-17 17:25 ` Anatolij Gustschin
2010-08-17 17:34 ` Graeme Smecher
2010-09-18 20:02 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-20 14:43 ` Graeme Smecher
2012-03-31 19:42 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-02 15:56 ` Graeme Smecher [this message]
2012-04-02 16:34 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F79CC28.6080605@threespeedlogic.com \
--to=gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox