[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] AT91SAM9*: Change kernel address in dataflash to match u-boot's size

["Andreas Bießmann" <andreas.devel@googlemail.com>]

Dear Wolfgang,

On 08.04.12 22:06, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Alexandre Belloni,
> 
> In message <1333909023-6725-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@piout.net> you wrote:
>> On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in
>> dataflash, the layout was:
>> bootstrap  0x00000000
>> ubootenv   0x00004200
>> uboot      0x00008400
>> kernel     0x00042000
>>
>> u-boot with the defconfig doesn't seem to fit in 0x42000 - 0x8400 =
>> 0x39C00 bytes anymore.
>>
>> Now, the layout is:
>> bootstrap  0x00000000
>> ubootenv   0x00004200
>> uboot      0x00008400
>> kernel     0x00084000
> 
> Where are these odd sizes like
> 
>>  #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE		0x4200
> 
> coming from?  Has a size of 0x4200 any special maning on these
> systems?

please read Ulfs mail:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/123862/focus=125897

I think it is OK to apply this patch.
All these atmel boards need some more attention (lack of maintainer).
Reinhard started to migrate a lot of stuff but unfortunately this
process is not completely finished. I will not say it is left undone but
there is still a lot to do.
I think another point is that these Atmel devices became less important
than before in U-Boot (I see not really much users here even though a
lot of people use it):
 a) a lot of users favor the at91bootstrap SPL to boot linux (no need
for u-boot)
 b) they have well-hung cores

best regards

Andreas Bie?mann

PS: besides a) there was a user in irc around Christmas who count 'the
SPL for atmel devices in U-Boot' a good idea. He said he wants to play
with it ... I wonder if he does.