From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] FAT: Properly align buffers to allow cache operations
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:20:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F844CAE.1010502@boundarydevices.com>
On 10.04.2012 17:07, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 10:00 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>>
>>> On Monday 09 April 2012 02:45:03 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> @@ -765,9 +767,6 @@
>>>>
>>>> -__attribute__ ((__aligned__ (__alignof__ (dir_entry))))
>>>> -__u8 do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE];
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> @@ -788,6 +787,7 @@ do_fat_read (const char *filename, void *buffer,
>>>>
>>>> int rootdir_size = 0;
>>>> int j;
>>>>
>>>> + uint8_t do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE]
>>>> __attribute__((aligned(32)));
>>>
>>> what's going on here exactly ? the old code had the advantage of
>>> being in
>>> the bss and the linker taking care of the alignment. this new code
>>> has an
>>> incorrectly hard-coded "32", and puts a 64KiB array onto the *stack*.
>>
>> This will be probably fixed in Eric's patch
>>
> Yep. I left it in bss space.
Sorry guys, but I'm confused now.
We have two patches, Eric's [1] and Marek's [2]. Which one should we
take? With the discussion here and [3] I'm somehow under the
impression that both patches [1] [2] are not complete?
Do I miss anything? Or do we need a new version ("best of [1] & [2]")?
Best regards
Dirk
[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/119311.html
[2] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122100.html
[3] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122126.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-10 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-09 6:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH] FAT: Properly align buffers to allow cache operations Marek Vasut
2012-04-09 8:20 ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-09 8:26 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-09 10:28 ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-09 10:44 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-09 13:35 ` Eric Nelson
2012-04-10 4:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-10 5:00 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-10 15:07 ` Eric Nelson
2012-04-10 16:20 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2012-04-10 20:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-04-10 23:13 ` Eric Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com \
--to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox