public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] FAT: Properly align buffers to allow cache operations
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:20:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F844CAE.1010502@boundarydevices.com>

On 10.04.2012 17:07, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 10:00 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Mike Frysinger,
>>
>>> On Monday 09 April 2012 02:45:03 Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> @@ -765,9 +767,6 @@
>>>>
>>>> -__attribute__ ((__aligned__ (__alignof__ (dir_entry))))
>>>> -__u8 do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE];
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> @@ -788,6 +787,7 @@ do_fat_read (const char *filename, void *buffer,
>>>>
>>>> int rootdir_size = 0;
>>>> int j;
>>>>
>>>> + uint8_t do_fat_read_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE]
>>>> __attribute__((aligned(32)));
>>>
>>> what's going on here exactly ? the old code had the advantage of
>>> being in
>>> the bss and the linker taking care of the alignment. this new code
>>> has an
>>> incorrectly hard-coded "32", and puts a 64KiB array onto the *stack*.
>>
>> This will be probably fixed in Eric's patch
>>
> Yep. I left it in bss space.

Sorry guys, but I'm confused now.

We have two patches, Eric's [1] and Marek's [2]. Which one should we 
take? With the discussion here and [3] I'm somehow under the 
impression that both patches [1] [2] are not complete?

Do I miss anything? Or do we need a new version ("best of [1] & [2]")?

Best regards

Dirk

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/119311.html

[2] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122100.html

[3] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-April/122126.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09  6:45 [U-Boot] [PATCH] FAT: Properly align buffers to allow cache operations Marek Vasut
2012-04-09  8:20 ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-09  8:26   ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-09 10:28     ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-09 10:44       ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-09 13:35     ` Eric Nelson
2012-04-10  4:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-10  5:00   ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-10 15:07     ` Eric Nelson
2012-04-10 16:20       ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2012-04-10 20:34         ` Wolfgang Denk
2012-04-10 23:13           ` Eric Nelson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox