From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Nelson <eric.nelson@boundarydevices.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:13:36 -0700
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] FAT: Properly align buffers to allow cache
	operations
In-Reply-To: <20120410203413.73718202B22@gemini.denx.de>
References: <1333953903-26335-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
	<201204100036.07124.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<201204100700.48644.marex@denx.de>
	<4F844CAE.1010502@boundarydevices.com>
	<4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com>
	<20120410203413.73718202B22@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <4F84BEA0.9090003@boundarydevices.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04/10/2012 01:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Dirk,
>
> In message<4F845DB6.7050002@googlemail.com>  you wrote:
>>
>> Sorry guys, but I'm confused now.
>
> Heh.  Me too ;-)
>
>> We have two patches, Eric's [1] and Marek's [2]. Which one should we
>> take? With the discussion here and [3] I'm somehow under the
>> impression that both patches [1] [2] are not complete?
>>
>> Do I miss anything? Or do we need a new version ("best of [1]&  [2]")?
>
> I'm waiting for Eric to post an updated patch that includes 1+2+3.
>

I guess I had better get busy ;)

I can probably handle 1 and 2 and my guess is that #3 will appear with
a fresh re-read of the code.

I should be able to get this out in the A.M. (Arizona time).

Regards,


Eric