From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:58:37 -0600
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] tegra: fdt: Add NAND controller binding
	and definitions
In-Reply-To: <4F8873D1.2010701@freescale.com>
References: <1334341777-2681-1-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
	<1334341777-2681-5-git-send-email-sjg@chromium.org>
	<4F8873D1.2010701@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <4F88937D.3090809@wwwdotorg.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 04/13/2012 12:43 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 01:29 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Add a NAND controller along with a bindings file for review.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

>> +++ b/doc/device-tree-bindings/nand/nvidia-nand.txt

>> +wp-gpio : GPIO of write-protect line, three cells in the format:
>> +		phandle, parameter, flags
> 
> nvidia,nand-wp-gpio

I'm not convinced about this. For example many SDHCI bindings use just
"wp-gpios" not "shdci-wp-gpios". Is there really a need to keep the
property names unique across all bindings, even though a given node only
relies on one binding?